Thanks Rickie, saved me some time.
www.podunkideas.com <--Click here
------------—————
https://www.crappie-gills-n-more.com/
https://cornfieldfishinggear.com/
------------------------>> Pro Staff Sonar Advisor
Thanks Rickie, saved me some time.
Kosmo
your 2d images look awesome. What are your set points to get those images
so do I still need to be using 6.49, and not be able to use my ipilot link or did they finally get 6.74 working correctly ?
www.podunkideas.com <--Click here
------------—————
https://www.crappie-gills-n-more.com/
https://cornfieldfishinggear.com/
------------------------>> Pro Staff Sonar Advisor
thanks Rickie
so I guess a fix for this problem is somewhere way down the road, if at all
again thank you sir
HB says they are still working on some sort of workaround to remedy the 83 and 83/200 pixelation problems. They say this is a solution other than the Dual Beam workaround. I've tried 6.60, 6.61 and 6.74 on my two 998s and, in every case, went back to 6.49. Many say SI (and, therefore, DI) are improved in 6.74 over 6.49. I didn't see that. So, I'll just stick with 6.49. I'm not using any of the newer technologies such as 360 Imaging, iPilot link or the HS antennae so I don't need the programming capabilities of 6.74.
I am using the HS, and the link on a 958 & 1198, 6.74 is not as good as 6.49 IMHO. 2D has not been fixed!
www.podunkideas.com <--Click here
------------—————
https://www.crappie-gills-n-more.com/
https://cornfieldfishinggear.com/
------------------------>> Pro Staff Sonar Advisor
Hope your wait isn't too much longer