Originally Posted by
David Waters
I want someone in office who believes what I believe in. If you need help, I will help you. It might be finding you a job, or buying you lunch, or giving you the shirt off my back. But it certainly wont be because of an affiliation to some freaking political party. It will be because I know it is the right thing to do.
I can totally agree with all that said and your right to help whomever you want with however much you want and absolutely nothing I believe in or advocate would deny your right to those actions. I am apposed to you reaching into my pockets with the help of government coercion and taking from me to help those you deem needy. That is a violation of my rights.
Originally Posted by
David Waters
Has everyone really gone that crazy as to not be able to see good in both sides on an argument?
Just what good can you tell me about in the second elements of arguments like these;
freedom vs slavery
liberty vs tyranny
healthy foods vs poison's
Thomas Jefferson vs Hitler
capitalism vs collectivism or socialism.
“There is no difference between communism and socialism, except in the means of achieving the same ultimate end: communism proposes to enslave men by force, socialism—by vote. It is merely the difference between murder and suicide.” Ayn Rand