Thanks Thanks:  0
HaHa HaHa:  0
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: Dark area on side scan?

  1. #11
    rnvinc's Avatar
    rnvinc is offline Crappie.com 2016 Man of the Year * Member Sponsor
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    West Ky
    Posts
    13,111
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default




    The SI slice beam sound pulse is strongest along its "Main Axis" and weaker at the outer fringes of the SI slice beam directly under the boat ...


    This weakening of the outer fringes of the SI slice beam will be more evident with the 800kHz simply because higher frequency sound wave attenuates (absorbs into the water) quicker than lower frequency ...(leaving less energy to be reflected off actual targets - especially in the outer fringes of the SI slice beam) ...

    Rickie
    www.podunkideas.com <--Click here
    ------------—————
    https://www.crappie-gills-n-more.com/
    https://cornfieldfishinggear.com/

    ------------------------>> Pro Staff Sonar Advisor
    Likes genec LIKED above post

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    kentucky
    Posts
    2,551
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rnvinc View Post


    The SI slice beam sound pulse is strongest along its "Main Axis" and weaker at the outer fringes of the SI slice beam directly under the boat ...


    This weakening of the outer fringes of the SI slice beam will be more evident with the 800kHz simply because higher frequency sound wave attenuates (absorbs into the water) quicker than lower frequency ...(leaving less energy to be reflected off actual targets - especially in the outer fringes of the SI slice beam) ...

    Rickie
    Well done rickie.sounds like lower frequency would be best used,all the time.But look at that first picture that I posted again.on the left side,were the structure is.look at how well the fish stand out,were the weaker part of the 800kHz beam is being absorbed into the bottom.notice how bright the fish(air bladder makes a hard return) returns are in comparison to the dark bottom.If this were a 455kHz si or even a 360 image.the stronger bottom return from the lower 455 frequency would make the fish hard to see.higher frequency, not only produces sharper images, but also can ,in some instances make fish stand out,on side imaging and hopefully,someday humminbird will add some form of a high frequency chirp to 360.

  3. #13
    rnvinc's Avatar
    rnvinc is offline Crappie.com 2016 Man of the Year * Member Sponsor
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    West Ky
    Posts
    13,111
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kosmo View Post
    Well done rickie.sounds like lower frequency would be best used,all the time.But look at that first picture that I posted again.on the left side,were the structure is.look at how well the fish stand out,were the weaker part of the 800kHz beam is being absorbed into the bottom.notice how bright the fish(air bladder makes a hard return) returns are in comparison to the dark bottom.If this were a 455kHz si or even a 360 image.the stronger bottom return from the lower 455 frequency would make the fish hard to see.higher frequency, not only produces sharper images, but also can ,in some instances make fish stand out,on side imaging and hopefully,someday humminbird will add some form of a high frequency chirp to 360.
    I run SI a little darker when looking for fish to allow the fish return to stand out better against a darker bottom ...



    I run SI a little brighter when looking for structure ...



    Setting the unit and never touching anything is under-utilizing the features these units are capable of ...

    Rickie
    www.podunkideas.com <--Click here
    ------------—————
    https://www.crappie-gills-n-more.com/
    https://cornfieldfishinggear.com/

    ------------------------>> Pro Staff Sonar Advisor
    Likes Redge LIKED above post

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    kentucky
    Posts
    2,551
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Good example,rickie. I would like to try 360 out on a higher frequency tho.455 seems harder to distinguish fish from bottom.lower the Sensitivity on 455.loose botton and fish, raise sensitivity,bright bottom,but hard to see fish. (Those last two picture that rickie posted,look like 800.the first picture looks like more of a softer bottom than that second one
    Last edited by kosmo; 11-25-2016 at 11:40 PM.
    Likes Redge LIKED above post

  5. #15
    rnvinc's Avatar
    rnvinc is offline Crappie.com 2016 Man of the Year * Member Sponsor
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    West Ky
    Posts
    13,111
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kosmo View Post
    (Those last two picture that rickie posted,look like 800.the first picture looks like more of a softer bottom than that second one
    Those shots are most likely 800kHz ...

    My fishing methods lean toward seeing more detail right at the boat ...

    I use 455kHz in new water looking for new structure ...

    Rickie
    www.podunkideas.com <--Click here
    ------------—————
    https://www.crappie-gills-n-more.com/
    https://cornfieldfishinggear.com/

    ------------------------>> Pro Staff Sonar Advisor

  6. #16
    Cane Pole's Avatar
    Cane Pole is offline Crappie.com 2011 Man of the Year * Crappie.com Supporter
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Pumphouse Tn.
    Posts
    24,011
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kosmo View Post
    I would say ,that most likely possibly could be
    I have never seen anything like this. It looked like a reverse course to me with the round thingies on right vs left and the similar depth change pattern in reverse. So, how was I or anyone else supposed to know?
    Member BS Pro-Staff and Billbob Pro-Staff
    Proud Member of Team Geezer... authorized by: billbob and "G"

  7. #17
    Cane Pole's Avatar
    Cane Pole is offline Crappie.com 2011 Man of the Year * Crappie.com Supporter
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Pumphouse Tn.
    Posts
    24,011
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    May be a case of the Babinet principle in ur picture. Of course Rickie is right about beam concentration.
    Member BS Pro-Staff and Billbob Pro-Staff
    Proud Member of Team Geezer... authorized by: billbob and "G"

  8. #18
    rnvinc's Avatar
    rnvinc is offline Crappie.com 2016 Man of the Year * Member Sponsor
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    West Ky
    Posts
    13,111
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cane Pole View Post
    May be a case of the Babinet principle in ur picture.
    Dang Tom ... I had to look that one up ...

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babinet's_principle

    Your knowledge of theory is amazing ...



    Rickie
    www.podunkideas.com <--Click here
    ------------—————
    https://www.crappie-gills-n-more.com/
    https://cornfieldfishinggear.com/

    ------------------------>> Pro Staff Sonar Advisor

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    kentucky
    Posts
    2,551
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rnvinc View Post
    This one looks like the "Ghost Lines" phenomenon when SI piezoes and a DI piezo are transmitting in the same xducer housing ...


    -----
    -----

    This one looks like the DI transmitter is shut off and only the SI piezoes are transmitting ...



    Rickie
    Those two pictures had the di piezo turned off.one picture is 800,the other is 455.the first picture that I posted is from a 998 that has no di piezo. It is set on 800.This picture is from my Onix.si and di are both set to 800.fish show really well in the dark area...
    Likes crappie flash LIKED above post

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    kentucky
    Posts
    2,551
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Here's one with side imaging set to 455.this picture was taken the same day and close to the same spot as that one above,just set to different frequency. On the picture that on 800.I could keep turning the Sensitivity up and thaT dark area would still be dark,but the fish returns would get even brighter than they show there.455 would just wash the fish out as the Sensitivity go's up

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP