Well done rickie.sounds like lower frequency would be best used,all the time.But look at that first picture that I posted again.on the left side,were the structure is.look at how well the fish stand out,were the weaker part of the 800kHz beam is being absorbed into the bottom.notice how bright the fish(air bladder makes a hard return) returns are in comparison to the dark bottom.If this were a 455kHz si or even a 360 image.the stronger bottom return from the lower 455 frequency would make the fish hard to see.higher frequency, not only produces sharper images, but also can ,in some instances make fish stand out,on side imaging and hopefully,someday humminbird will add some form of a high frequency chirp to 360.