Likes Likes:  0
Thanks Thanks:  0
HaHa HaHa:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: 899 side and down imaging looks awful

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    456
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default


    I don't especially like the humviewer interface, very awkward tools etc. The zoom is not even a zoom half the time and stretches the picture. Is there another viewer that works and is better?

  2. #12
    rnvinc's Avatar
    rnvinc is offline Crappie.com 2016 Man of the Year * Member Sponsor
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    West Ky
    Posts
    13,111
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Here is more info ...
    Other 3rd Party Software

    (I have no experience with any of the others listed there) ...

    Rickie
    www.podunkideas.com <--Click here
    ------------—————
    https://www.crappie-gills-n-more.com/
    https://cornfieldfishinggear.com/

    ------------------------>> Pro Staff Sonar Advisor

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    456
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Ok here are some screen shots from today. I had to turn sensitivity all the way down to 2 a few times then 6 never above 8. Also needed to up contrast to 20 a few times to get a reasonable picture. Is this normal? Almost seems like that 855kh issue where it is way too hot, but this is 455? Also looks much better on the screen then it does with the raw data on humviewer, anyone else find that? Here are the pictures tell me if they are reasonable for 455khz.
    Last edited by Zippy; 04-03-2015 at 10:09 PM.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    456
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Name:  image.jpg
Views: 362
Size:  62.0 KBName:  image.jpg
Views: 369
Size:  75.8 KBName:  image.jpg
Views: 397
Size:  69.4 KBName:  image.jpg
Views: 395
Size:  86.8 KBName:  image.jpg
Views: 383
Size:  125.6 KBName:  image.jpg
Views: 364
Size:  44.6 KB

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    456
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    First picture is of the bulkhead before the boat ramp. Check out the second to last picture, on the right hand side, second fish down, perfect crappie outline! Was really excited when I saw that. Third picture down looks like a pile of rubble with fish all over it.

    Anyhow just wonder if these are any good and what to be expected with the 899 with 455khz.

  6. #16
    rnvinc's Avatar
    rnvinc is offline Crappie.com 2016 Man of the Year * Member Sponsor
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    West Ky
    Posts
    13,111
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Looks good to me ...

    I see a little bit of water aeration in the right SI ... (Repeating horizontal darker lines) ...

    That could be from the boat going too fast for that xducer placement or something on the right side hull creating bubbles that the right SI beam is picking up ...

    It's not unusual to change the SI Sensitivity dependent on bottom composition/water depth ...

    I keep my SI Enhance mini window up anytime I'm viewing SI so that I can instantly adjust the SI Sensitivity as the screen brightness changes due to bottom composition/water depth ...

    Rickie
    www.podunkideas.com <--Click here
    ------------—————
    https://www.crappie-gills-n-more.com/
    https://cornfieldfishinggear.com/

    ------------------------>> Pro Staff Sonar Advisor

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    456
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Thanks Rickie. So in you estimation does shallow water cause that "hotness" in the picture? This is all mud and very little hard bottom. Also, any idea why the data displayed in humviewer is so "milky" and sensitive to direction changes from the boat? Reviewing the info on the computer is crazy, I can see every slight departure from a straight line. Anyhow, it looks really good on the screen just not good at all of humviewer. I will play with the transducer a bit. I did see those lines when underway and actually poked my head over the side to see the turbulence around the transducer.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    456
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Oh yeah, not sure if your seeing those lines on the third picture down but they are from two pilings that are from an old dock.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    456
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Name:  image.jpg
Views: 365
Size:  35.8 KB

    Here is a snapshot from humviewer. It's the same brush pile that is pictured in the 4th picture above. At first I thought this was just a pile of wood that collected in this spot. Pretty sure it is a pile of Christmas trees purposely put here. Too lined up to be random. Lots of nice crappie on this spot.

  10. #20
    rnvinc's Avatar
    rnvinc is offline Crappie.com 2016 Man of the Year * Member Sponsor
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    West Ky
    Posts
    13,111
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Imaging in Humviewer is definitely different than viewing on the unit because Humviewer is processing the raw data where the unit is basically showing a "moving screenshot" of what's on the display ...

    I find that viewing both at the same time makes it invaluable to compare the things found in each ...

    It's not unusual for certain Enviromental conditions to create brighter returns ... This is where keeping the SI Enhance window up where the SI Sensitivity can be changed easily ...

    SI Sensitivity is the most used setting on my 1197 ...

    Rickie
    www.podunkideas.com <--Click here
    ------------—————
    https://www.crappie-gills-n-more.com/
    https://cornfieldfishinggear.com/

    ------------------------>> Pro Staff Sonar Advisor

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP