Thanks Thanks:  0
HaHa HaHa:  0
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: DNR Response concerning 10" size limit

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Chilton, WI
    Posts
    1,423
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default DNR Response concerning 10" size limit


    This is what I received today from the DNR.

    Dear Mr. Manz:

    Thank you for your interest in conserving crappie populations in
    Georgia. The Board of Natural Resources requested that I respond to
    your e-mail. The Fisheries Section of the Georgia Department of Natural
    Resources (DNR) has the responsibility managing crappie populations and
    are always interested in working with avid fisherman like yourself to
    assure that we are making sound management decisions. I would like to
    first go into a little history how we manage and study our resources,
    and then offer some suggestions on how we might work together in the
    future.

    The Department routinely monitors the fish populations in all of our
    major bodies of water with annual standardized sampling and creel
    surveys. In addition, other special studies are often conducted to
    address specific management concerns. Creel surveys have routinely
    shown that crappie are often among the top three most sought-after and
    harvested species in the State. To this end, we conduct and maintain a
    fish attractor program on most of our major reservoirs that are
    specifically targeted towards crappie fishermen. Along with
    long-standing fish attractor program, DNR has also been involved with
    many studies looking at the potential benefits of minimum length limits.


    As you are aware, the state currently has a 30-fish harvest limit and
    no minimum length limit. Length limits for crappie have shown varying
    results where enacted in other states and several characteristics are
    common: 1) at low levels of natural mortality, minimum size limits may
    have a positive impact; conversely, at high levels of natural mortality,
    minimum size limits may have negative impacts; 2) the effectiveness of
    minimum size limits is variable and generally increases with increased
    angler exploitation; 3) minimum size limits reduce harvest; and 4)
    growth is important to size limits. With slow growth, natural mortality
    could claim 50 to 70 percent of the crappie before they reach minimum
    length.

    The challenge with length limits is the assumption that crappie
    population dynamics are similar between reservoirs across the state and
    that is not the case; each body of water has different growth,
    mortality, and crappie recruitment rates. Therefore, site-specific
    regulations may provide the more effective management strategy than an
    all-encompassing statewide regulation.

    Fisheries biologists have long recognized the potential for improving
    crappie populations through the use of minimum size limits or other
    restrictive regulations and a number of studies were conducted in
    Georgia even before neighboring states thought of length limits. We
    first looked at intensively managing crappie populations in the late
    1980’s with large-scale studies on three major lakes - Allatoona,
    Oconee, and Sinclair. Each study gathered information on crappie
    abundance, growth rates, and mortality (natural and fishing). The
    studies continued for a number of years and for subsequent years after
    that; other State biologists likewise gathered information on crappie
    populations in Lake Jackson, Lake Nottely, West Point, and Lake Weiss.


    One of the key things that our biologists learned was natural mortality
    in crappie populations was high. The tagging studies and netting
    surveys showed that on average, about 53% of adult crappie die each year
    whether caught or not. These studies indicated that with size limits,
    more fish will be lost to natural causes, fewer crappie will be
    harvested by anglers (60% fewer), and the number of quality size fish
    would only slightly increase. Therefore, a regulation change would not
    greatly improve the crappie population or angler satisfaction.

    We also recognize a very important point that you made in regards to
    the economic impact of crappie fishing. The Department is well underway
    with the Go Fish Georgia initiative aimed at increasing fishing based
    tourism and tournament activity. This effort will include 18 new mega
    tournament ramp facilities throughout our state, and within a year will
    open a Go Fish Georgia Center in Perry, GA that will help promote and
    enhance Georgia’s fishery resources. Although much of the marketing
    emphasis is placed on largemouth bass, our Department and local
    communities have all recognized the value of these facilities in
    increasing economic activity associated with crappie fishing and
    tournaments.

    The Fisheries Section is committed to serving the citizens of Georgia
    and anglers of this state while protecting the resources using sound
    scientific principles of fisheries management for the good of all
    anglers. Perhaps there is a specific body of water where you think a
    minimum size limit might be most desirable? If so, please contact me
    and we will be happy to evaluate the data for a specific body of water.
    Also, the Department periodically holds public hearings to gather input
    from our anglers and share data that we have collected throughout the
    years. Perhaps a local public forum would be another step in assuring
    we are best serving you and all crappie fishermen for a particular
    reservoir.

    Again, I thank you for your interest and look forward to hearing from
    you.

    Steve L. Schleiger
    Georgia Dept. of Natural Resources
    Wildlife Resources Division
    Fisheries Section
    1014 Martin Luther King Blvd.
    Fort Valley, GA 31030
    478-825-6150 (voice)
    478-825-6153 (fax)
    [email protected]
    Likes hobo LIKED above post

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Chilton, WI
    Posts
    1,423
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    This was my response. I think some of us need to try to meet with Mr. Schleiger. Smitty, Joe, jroz...what say you?

    Mr. Schleiger,

    Thank you for your response. It contains an abundance of information to which I was not aware. I will discuss this with the group of people I have been dealing with to decide on a course of action. Would you be willing to meet with us in the near future to discuss this? Just so you know we are not a radical organization I would ask that you visit slabfest.org This is a grassroots effort to improve the crappie fishing in the State of Georgia. We are not organized to resist the GADNR, but to combine our efforts to make crappie fishing a viable and enjoyable sport for the present day anglers and those in the future.

    Again, thank you for your response. I look forward to discussing this with you in the near future.

    Jim Manz
    Likes hobo LIKED above post

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Grovetown, GA
    Posts
    2,651
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Great info thanks for sharing that with us.
    Aquatic Species Removal Engineer

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Elberton, GA
    Posts
    2,148
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Wow. The DNR went all out in providing a very detailed, balanced, and informative explanation of the merits and detractions that minimum size limits can produce. I'm very pleased that they went to such great lengths to explain their position in response to a fisherman's letter!
    Remember....Good Things Come to Those Who Bait......

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Lake Tobosofkee GA.
    Posts
    716
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    THATS GREAT NEWS JIM...
    Jroz and I had previosly spoken with his assistant back in November and felt that Steve was the go to guy but your letter confirms it Jim. At that time we were told that the testing results would be compiled and ready for discussion and/or pick up just after the first of the year. I will be contacting him tommorrow to schedule a meeting to better determine which locations can and will benefit from what we here have previously discussed on this board.

    I plan to relate to him what the ORG's intentions are and to envite Steve to frequent this board if possible. Hopfully he can assist us in understanding and implementing what is truely beneficial towards acheiving a long term solution for this harvesting problem on the various reservoirs within his jurisdiction.

    I am very aware of the substance that his letter has stated as i have been researching his articles for the last couple of months. He has breifly summarized the possible impact and complexitie's of his studies in this above mentioned letter. Obviously, this is much more complicated than we first thought because the Ga. reservoirs are so diverse and individual in their specific needs.

    Once we have an overall assessment from his continueing studies in hand can we then begin to start piecing this compicated puzzle together.
    I want to thank you Jim, and all the others that participated in getting attention drawn to this important subject, now it's time to get the ball rolling...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Sylacauga Alabama
    Posts
    1,599
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    My hats off to you guys that are trying to better your fishery's. I dont fish Ga much but plan to get up there more this year as time allows. I will say that when the daily limit went down and the size went up on the big 4 lakes in mississippi, that is the best thing that could have been done ans they are really producing now! I wish we(Mississippi) would do it to one more Lake soon and that lake would be Ross Barnett Rez).
    Its Foolish and wrong to morn the men who died, instead we should thank God that such men lived.
    General George S. Patton Jr

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Acworth, GA
    Posts
    226
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I appreciate your efforts on geeting this information. Please continue to keep us informed. Thanks Robert
    I Support a Crappie Slot/Size Limit

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Brooksville, FL (Originally from Terre Haute, IN.)
    Posts
    2,061
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Great info. Thanks for sharing.

    Chuck
    From Steve Wunderele - 10-2-84 --"A fishing trip maybe brief, but it's memories are endless."

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Perry Ga
    Posts
    694
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Thanks Jim for the info . Like Joe said we have already talked to his office and planned on a meeting with him. Joe let me know what is said today. Thanks for yall efforts to support this

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Kite, Georgia
    Posts
    2,070
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Dnr Bs

    I never have believed all this BS.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP