Kosmo, do you think the 2d may be improved mainly because the cone angle has changed with the update? I still thing the downimaging is way more useful for me- but I mainly fish for striper.
Kosmo, do you think the 2d may be improved mainly because the cone angle has changed with the update? I still thing the downimaging is way more useful for me- but I mainly fish for striper.
They CANT hide!!!! You catch any of em????? What were they???
Would have liked to have seen a DI image of that school. It gives me a headache to focus very long on the 360 images, and the 2d sonar (Chirp or not) just doesn't do it for me, anymore, now that I have a DI unit.
... cp
I think the lower the freq, the greater the cone angle. Also mutliple freq(chirp) has a greater cone angle. My opinion, but I think chirp is over rated for water less than 100ft. Down imaging has better target separation also. But I'm usually moving following or finding schools of striper and bait.