Thanks Thanks:  0
HaHa HaHa:  0
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 37

Thread: Garmin 93sv Review

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Kansas, United States
    Posts
    1,153
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Garmin 93sv Review


    My opinion purely. I have a HB 998HD on the console.


    Ok so far including 2 long days Saturday and Sunday spent on the water running the 93sv. I am still messing with the adjustments some looking for the sweet spot. I have a HB 998 HD on the console. The Garmin screen just appears Huge compared to the HB. The Garmin is sharp and clear. The 2d and Downvu is hands down better. The Garmin sidevu on mine is Not better than the HB 998 for scanning fish. Side structure scanning the 93sv is better but for pure fish scanning looking for and finding fish the HB side scan is better. No question what so ever presently in my opinion. I have not found where I can really fine tune the sensitivity and other options to really make the fish jump out like they do on the HB.

    The other thing I have noted. The 2d and downvu on the garmin seems to lock in on the tops parts of a school of fish. Example: 25fow.....bait fish and school of whites stretched from 8ft to 18ft deep with the bottom being 25ft deep. The HB reads the bottom all the time and the Garmin keeps locking in on the top and middle part of the school reading 8ft deep as bottom depth. The image is great but this seriously suxs not being able to read and display all the way the bottom. The 2d on single or small schools is no issue but on the larger ones is where I saw this. I know the lake so I knew this was wrong and checked the HB on the console and it read fine. Seems like a software issue. The other issue I am noting is only having 1 card slot is a major drawback when on is filled with the map card. In this price range there should be 2 slots. The Garmin Ultra Lake mapping chip is the best I have ever seen.

    I know I as one of the new owners of a brand new product I am sort of a beta tester but.......this is what I am noting. I fish 30fow or less 90% of the time. The more I run it the more I am starting to be convinced that it does basics better than anyone else out there but for detail work it lacks the ability to fine tune.


    Auto mode does not pick out fish very well for me.I tried to take some screen shots but ran into a problem with the unit not recognizing my 8gb sandisk card. Sandisk Card works fine in home computer. I bought a PNY card for it as that is the same card the Ultra Lake Map is on. I will try the new PNY card this weekend for screen shots. I slipped the Ultra Map back in and read it fine.

    The other thing noted is scrolling speed . You have better adjustment with the HB as there are 10 settings and 4 with the garmin. The HB side scans better at very slow speeds and the garmin seems to do best above 0.8mph. If you are just barely crawling along the HB I think does better.

    I will be fishing Sunday and will really scrub the user manual to do mostly just scanning to mess with the unit to see what I can do.

    So up to now in my opinion.

    2D: Garmin
    Downvu: Garmin
    Sidevu Fish: Humminbird
    Sidevu Structure: Garmin
    Screen: Garmin
    Detail settings; Humminbird
    Mapping: Garmin
    Ease of use: Garmin
    GPS: Garmin
    Card Slots: Humminbird
    Bottom Lock: Humminbird
    Beam Select: Humminbird 455/800 (garmin only has 455)
    Networking: Humminbird
    Price: Garmin
    Warranty: Humminbird (2yrs)
    Product Support: Humminbird simply because Garmin tech support does not know much about the 93sv
    Likes Bassmanatcs, Zippy LIKED above post

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Smithville, Mo
    Posts
    3,071
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    KAG-thanks for doing the beta test for us!! I feel better now about ordering new H'birds. I can wait a year or two for Garmin to improve the things you mentioned, (or for H'bird to improve theirs!). I attended an H'bird seminar this weekend and the topic went to CHIRP. The rep said that true "CHIRP" transducers are, at minimum, the size of a football and the better ones are twice that big. He said that what mfg's are calling CHIRP is only a very small % of the freq's that true CHIRP covers. But he also said that since one mfg is saying they have CHIRP, this means H'bird (and others), will have to put the same technology in some of their new models in order to keep up.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Kansas, United States
    Posts
    1,153
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    New software update is out so i will load that up and see

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    8,237
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Great report

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Kensett, Arkansas
    Posts
    6,304
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vic n View Post
    KAG-thanks for doing the beta test for us!! I feel better now about ordering new H'birds. I can wait a year or two for Garmin to improve the things you mentioned, (or for H'bird to improve theirs!). I attended an H'bird seminar this weekend and the topic went to CHIRP. The rep said that true "CHIRP" transducers are, at minimum, the size of a football and the better ones are twice that big. He said that what mfg's are calling CHIRP is only a very small % of the freq's that true CHIRP covers. But he also said that since one mfg is saying they have CHIRP, this means H'bird (and others), will have to put the same technology in some of their new models in order to keep up.
    Been telling folks that have a so called "CHIRP" sonar that cost maybe 700 bucks that it was not true CHIRP. The same as you say....true CHIRP costs a lot of money. I spent 31 years in the radar and missile field which is where CHIRP was first used. Most of those so called CHIRP units are nothing more than software enhancements of 2D sonar. Not bashing any brand of sonar but true CHIRP....no matter the brand, cost big money.

    Regards
    Likes vic n LIKED above post

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    1,353
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Thanks for the detailed report ...... Keep it up
    _______________________________________
    Looking for the one that makes it all worthwhile.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Western Chicago Burbs
    Posts
    14
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I have one of these on the way. I will be retiring my LCX 27c. I have wanted a DI Si unit for a past few years. Reading your reviews convinced me to try a Garmin. I am pretty excited.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Central Va
    Posts
    332
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Thanks for the non biased report.

    Might not be true CHIRP but certainly better than standard sonar even in shallow water.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Kansas, United States
    Posts
    1,153
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I will load the new software tonight and fish it tomorrow afternoon. The Garmin has already done one thing to affect the industry.....made others be more competitive in their pricing
    Likes BobB LIKED above post

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Kansas, United States
    Posts
    1,153
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Update completed. From version 2.30 to 2.40. I had 2, 8gb sandisk cards (brand new) these will NOT work in the Garmin unit. I had a brand new PNY 8gb card that I tried and it loaded and updated without any problem. Do not use Sandisk Micro sd cards in these units.....or they refuse to work in my Garmin. I did test them and they worked fine in home PC, in cell phone, and my G Pad.

    I saw nothing different in the menu options afterward. To update you turn the unit on first and then after it completely boots up you insert the card and the unit takes over......follow the prompts.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP