Likes Likes:  0
Thanks Thanks:  0
HaHa HaHa:  0
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 40

Thread: whats eating sized?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    richland, wa
    Posts
    101
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default whats eating sized?


    i live in washington and all the bluegill i have caught so far dont seem to be of eating size. so for all you people down south with better warmwater than me, what do you consider eating sized fish and how do you cook the smaller ones.
    raising your voice, the next best thing to being right

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Scott, AR
    Posts
    1,489
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Smaller ones, just scale and fry whole, fillet if big enough. As far as whats big enough for keepers, depends on how hungry I am for fresh fish... Sometimes it might be just over hand size.


    You Can Make a Difference!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    254
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    7'' is the smallest that i will keep, and i fillet all mine.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Crawfordville, FL
    Posts
    100
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Like LM I prefer to catch the big ones but for eating I like hand size and smaller.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    130
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    i am from arkansas i keep 8 to 9 inch or bigger and i filet all of mine

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    bayou chicot louisiana
    Posts
    259
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default size

    once i get about 60 head in the freezer i get real picky,9" on chinks ,8" on gills.
    we catch a lot of 10" plus chinks this time of year,i skin all of mine ,although i have been trying to filet some .i have never tired it on panfish but i am getting the hang of it.

  7. #7
    chaunc's Avatar
    chaunc is offline 2014 Crappie.com Man of the Year * Crappie.com Supporter
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Sharon, Pa.
    Posts
    9,610
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    This is eating size for me.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Wise County,Va
    Posts
    816
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chaunc View Post
    This is eating size for me.

    Thats for sure eatin size.Nice gill

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Northern Cayuga County, NY
    Posts
    1,640
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I'm in NY, so we get our fair share of smaller gills. In general, for me to keep them, they need to be 7-8" and must be "fat" so they are easy to fillet.

    For smaller fish, which are just as good to eat, just not easy to fillet, I scale them, cut off the heads and gut them, then remove the dorsal and anal fins (leave the tail on). To cook gills prepped this way, we go real simple. roll or shake in a mix of flour and salt & pepper, then pan-fry in butter. To me, this is the best tasting way to eat them, but you have the bones to deal with - and also will have a mess from scaling them (scales love to stick to human skin). The biggest reason I fillet everything nowadays is simply for speed. I can fillet three in the time it takes me to scale one.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Quad City area on IL side
    Posts
    781
    Post Thanks / Like

    Thumbs up Help the fishery

    sharpshooter, If you get fast at filleting, It really helps smaller waters to pull all the smaller and mid sized you can, I filleted 78 last night that most wouldn't mess with. At 2 per min. it don't take forever to have a nice mess of what I call "potatoe chip" fillets. They fry fast, taste great and will help the population size a bunch. Mike

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP