Thanks Thanks:  0
HaHa HaHa:  0
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 30

Thread: Without a Fish Finder....how good are you?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Tavares, Fl
    Posts
    11,091
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default


    I would fish no different. Now in the fall trolling without my handheld gps for speed would be trying but I bet I could. Dont have any fancy electronics on my boat now so I havent been spoiled yet. But my next boat will have the nicer units. Aint gonna knock somebody that has em fer sure.
    Likes "D" LIKED above post

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Dawsonville, Georgia
    Posts
    1,130
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    If your fishing Lake Lanier, good luck!!!!!!! Dock shooting is the way to go here but you'd have to shoot a lot of docks before you find em. On other lakes, I'd longline to cover as much water as possible. Drop a buoy everytime I caught one. Then use em like waypoints and troll past them.
    Fishing is like pizza.......Even when it's not that good, it's still pretty good!
    Member of Lanier Crappie Anglers.com or net
    Likes blueball, chaunc, Idunno LIKED above post

  3. #13
    Slabprowler is offline Crappie.com Legend * Crappie.com Supporter
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Scottsboro Al
    Posts
    9,483
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Ant never had one them nice fish finder/gps units and don't catch as many as some but catch my share .I have fished a couple times with folks that do and one day I plan on and am hoping to get one I have always wondered what makes the fish be here or their .but do know that if I don't never make it to that point to get one I will keep on fishing because the more u fish the more you learn .the more water you conver the more honey holes you find.
    Likes crappienapper, whiskerwhipper LIKED above post

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Kensett, Arkansas
    Posts
    6,309
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I owned boats from 2001-2004 with sonar...then went until 2015 before I got another boat. I had a backpack that I had loaded with gear...water. I would take one rod and beat the banks at Center Hill...Pickwick...Nickajack.....and walk 7-9 miles a day fishing. I keep logs. While I now have an si unit I still have my logs as to where and when I found crappie beating the banks. They have returned to same spots for years. Now I use my sonar and am locating tons of fish with it...and I don't want to give it up....but as most on this forum know one has to put the time in...and a lot of work to catch the fish consistently.


    Regards

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    4,465
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Really depends on how I'm fishing. Most of the time I don't even look at mine. Long lining would be a little harder. Also driving at night would be hard on some of the lakes I fish. That being said I feel very confident without it most of the time.

    Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    1,082
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Even the smallest most rudimentary model is an invaluable fishing aid. The value does vary depending on exactly how,when,and where your fishing. I caught fish before they came out....and I still use some basic models...still do not have a high end one. But how can you underestimate the ability to locate submerged weed beds,brush,humps,holes,stumps,channels.To be able to tell what the basic bottom composition and contour are,to determine the slope of a bank or the length and contour of a point, and to quickly assess the depth of the thermocline,etc.etc.? Even if they never showed me a fish.... It's going to help me catch more fish.

    If you are fishing a lake that has submerged grass,and you note on the finder that your bites are coming from grass in the 6 to 7 ft depth range and the grass is about two to three feet tall and dense. The finder has helped you establish that...more quickly than you would otherwise. Now...you catch the fish off that spot...how much faster will you be able to find similar spots with the finder versus without it? How much more quickly will you be able to determine the size of it and the spots of highest probability with it versus without it?

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Western MA
    Posts
    6,901
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Before I got my first "Green Box", I used maps an awful lot. When no maps were available, I used a hand line with a one pound weight to mark and plot structures on a hand drawn map. Of course, back then I was a heck of a lot younger and a lot more determined than I am these days. I would not think about going on the water without a sonar anymore.
    "A voyage in search of knowledge need never abandon the spirit of adventure."

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Romania, SC
    Posts
    634
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quite a few people I know are obsessed with having state of the art electronics on their boats. They drive around more often huntn for fish than actually trying out an area. Then their game plans fall apart when a unit freezes up or transducer cable get ginzued by a prop. My theory is there is a 2 part equation to catching fish. First part is finding them. If you can find them, super. Next part is presenting your bait(s) to them. No high end unit in the world can get them to bite. Not even cussing at the screen will work. I use a basic Lowrance X-3 on my freighter to find them or prevent myself from wasting time in too shallow or deep of water. Since I got a low powered boat, I don't go far from the ramp so i know my way back to port.
    Oh I could wrestle a monster fish

  9. #19
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Grenada Lake, Ms / Cherokee Village, Ar
    Posts
    2,976
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Most the guys I know would have a whole lot more money in there pockets without them for sure. I think we'd still catch a fair amount of crappie without electronics. We did in the past years, I'm almost 71 years old, and we have caught stingers full without fish finders when I was young. A tournament without them would be a hoot....lol

  10. #20
    CrappiePappy's Avatar
    CrappiePappy is offline Super Moderator - 2013 Man Of The Year * Crappie.com Supporter
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Lexington, KY
    Posts
    23,569
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Well ... w/o a depth finder, I'd be fishing visible cover most of the time. I'd also still be using minners a lot more often than I do, now, and trying different places that produced in the past (which is exactly what I did back before there was such a thing as a depth finder).

    How good would I be ?? But, I'd probably still be fishing, catching fish, and enjoying myself, now, just like I always have.
    Likes "G" LIKED above post

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP