Thanks Thanks:  0
HaHa HaHa:  0
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 36

Thread: DNR Considering Raising Fishing and Hunting License

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Bluffton Indiana
    Posts
    102
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default


    DNR Home





    Fish & Wildlife > About Us > Funding for Fish & Wildlife Funding for Fish & Wildlife

    The Division of Fish & Wildlife sells hunting, fishing, and trapping licenses. All revenue is used for managing fish and wildlife resources in Indiana. No license money goes into the state general fund.

    • The DFW also receives money through the Sport Fish and Wildlife Restoration Programs administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Indiana receives approximately $10 for every person who purchases a fishing license and $42 for every person who purchases a hunting license. Indiana received $16.5 million in federal apportionment in 2016. This money is used to manage fish and wildlife resources in Indiana. So, even if you don’t hunt or fish, you can buy a combination license at $25/year and Indiana will receive an additional $52 in federal funds to be used for fish and wildlife conservation.

  2. #22
    cevans's Avatar
    cevans is offline Crappie.com Legend * Crappie.com Supporter
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Southern Indiana
    Posts
    5,424
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flytier View Post
    You guys are really bumming me out about the Indiana fishing, But Michigan is not much better, and their licenses money, they are more worried about the salmon than any thing.
    You missed the best fishing ever in Lake Michigan as well as Huron, St. Clair For salmon fishing in the 70's and early 80's. I filled the boat with all 5 species of salmon, held the brown trout record of 20.5 lbs for a half year, and,it was nothing to catch Kings up to 35 lbs one after another. I still have a few pics of old days that will never be the same. I even gave up bow hunting as I chased salmon and walleye on Erie every weekend. Michigan found out the Great Lakes couldn't sustain the numbers of salmon they were hatchery producing and had to cut it all to pieces as well as loosing a few years of brood stock to disease in their hatcheries wiping years of fish stockings. It was tremendous fishing while it lasted.

    PROUD MEMBER OF TEAM GEEZER
    authorized by: Billbob and "G"

  3. #23
    cevans's Avatar
    cevans is offline Crappie.com Legend * Crappie.com Supporter
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Southern Indiana
    Posts
    5,424
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Been sitting here thinking how fishing has changed in my life time of 67 yrs. and it's all now about fish management by every state and government due to the tremendous fishing pressure we all put on the fisheries. Years ago, I would bass fish a strip pit and in the spring, hitting them just at the right time, we'd catch nothing but stringers of 3-4-5 up to 8lb bass over and over and the limit then was 12 per person and we had all those strip pits to our selves as there wasn't any fishing pressure, but we didn't realize how long it took those fish to grow or reproduce by keeping the fat females and eating all we caught as we never considered any large enough to mount always thinking our next fish would be larger. Every year in the 70's and 80's we take fly in trips all over Canada flying into small lakes that were maybe 1/2 mile wide and 10-15 miles long and if the outfitter flew several groups of 4-6 fishermen every 5 days from last week of May thru their late summer of August, we fished those lakes completely out to where the outfitter after 5-7 years moved to a new lake to keep doing his business. Back then you could keep 12 of each species not to mention we were eating fish 3 meals a day per person. No body ever thought or knew how long it would take a lake trout to reach a size of 20 or 30 lbs back then. Canada had to learn to manage their resources due to fishing pressure and short growing season. Inventions-- I remember when the first flasher fish finder came on the market. States like Minn. and Wis. and Mich. considered and even did in some cases outlawed the use of them for a short time giving in to pressure from the public to use them. TV, Sports and Fishing Shows, Bait shops, magazines and books educated the masses. Rods, reels, baits all improved with technology. Look how much money we spend just on the rigging of our boats. First it was, we traveled and found our way with paper maps and compasses, then Loran C's, now GPS and map software. Fish finders from flasher graphs then paper graphs, now video and 3-d. And to top it all off, we now have forums to learn by. You have forums for every specie of fish to teach a person how to fish. And......what about the fish? What has he had to learn from,,, in order to survive?

    I know we all give our DNR's a pretty hard time and we all want to have better fishing. Some of us are even willing to agree to pay a little more if we think it will help. The battle line is, the masses keep growing in numbers and thus so does the fishing pressure, but does the growth of our DNR's or can they even grow and keep up with the demand from the masses and our use of all our technology and improved fishing equipment as well as what we have all learned?
    Last edited by cevans; 01-18-2017 at 09:25 PM.

    PROUD MEMBER OF TEAM GEEZER
    authorized by: Billbob and "G"

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    In
    Posts
    10
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I'm not going to complain about the money. That's my choice to burn it. My main problem about Indiana,which where I live, is the waste of opportunity to spend it wisely. Here in southern Indiana there's more fisherman than water. Bluegrass is a prime example the state could've bought the whole area but elected only to buy half. Maybe if we were closer to Indianapolis they would've bought the whole area.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Columbus Indiana
    Posts
    905
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flytier View Post
    You guys are really bumming me out about the Indiana fishing, But Michigan is not much better, and their licenses money, they are more worried about the salmon than any thing.
    I'm bummed out also, Indiana is my home and I don't have enough years left in my life to see a significant improvement.
    I guess we should all call or contact our state senate and house.

  6. #26
    cevans's Avatar
    cevans is offline Crappie.com Legend * Crappie.com Supporter
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Southern Indiana
    Posts
    5,424
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    You just have to become a smarter fisherman and spend more time fishing and expect a little less in the catch. And enjoy the moments of being outdoors relaxing and enjoying the moments.

    PROUD MEMBER OF TEAM GEEZER
    authorized by: Billbob and "G"

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Hooterville IN.
    Posts
    2,358
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    paying more wont help the hunting or fishing one bit. its a management and mismanagement issue. the deer herd being one shinning example!

    they made a huge mistake, in the initial large jump in license fees several years back, and it gutted their wallet a bit. they been trying to catch up ever since.

    even though they had to have had a huge take from all the lifetime licenses that year, we didnt see any improvements for sportsmen. no reason to think it would be any different with this.
    Likes wannabe fisherman, gijimbo LIKED above post

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Corydon, Indiana
    Posts
    178
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by river scum View Post
    its a management and mismanagement issue. the deer herd being one shinning example!
    I will agree with you on everything but the deer herd. Indiana is becoming a destination for trophy whitetail. There have been more scoreable bucks killed in Indiana in the last 5 years than in the last 50. What resources DNR is putting back in the field is about 80% hunting related and 10% fishing and 10% upgrading facilities. I have long said Indiana is so far behind other states when it comes to our fisheries that we will have nothing to catch before they ever attempt to actually properly manage our fisheries. Then they will stand back and ask what happened.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Hooterville IN.
    Posts
    2,358
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    and your assuming everyone wants "trophy hunting". thats far from the case. look around on the net and see hordes of indiana hunters complaining(even in 8doe counties!). its just a few that only want to shoot horns, most hunt for meat. horns are only good for decorations, crafts and and egos. i only heard 6 shots, including mine, on opening day this year. everyone else in the area saying the same thing. then i only seen 4 deer the rest of the season. sounds like bad management to me.
    Likes gijimbo LIKED above post

  10. #30
    cevans's Avatar
    cevans is offline Crappie.com Legend * Crappie.com Supporter
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Southern Indiana
    Posts
    5,424
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Indiana is not protecting its deer herd by any means. Here in Martin Co we used to have 30 deer per sq. Mile ave. They were always large in size, never diseased or starved due to lack of food. We always chased big racks. Too many doe tags have lowered it to 5 deer per sq. mile. Check in on line system has increased poaching and lots of locals don't even bother to check them in with the 48 hrs given time now to check in. DNR is not making the efforts anymore to set up at nite to tackle the poaching around here even tho we now have one more officer and they are better equipped. One DNR officer, during hunting season now sits in Rural King's parking lot and as he see's hunters carrying out deer feed bags of corn and cocane, runs their license plates and then goes and checks the area they hunt to see if they are baiting deer. The easy ticket write up on the dummies. Too many bobcats. I have one that I bet weighs 60 lbs and now seeing bone piles here and there from them taking down the fawns and wild turkeys. I have way too many bobcats running my property and have busted a couple with 6 shot to get them de-humanized to protect my house pets. Even tho I have my local DNR's phone numbers, they never answer a call on issues so I give up trying to help them up. And everybody thinks it's getting better? Hunting is just like fishing. You have experienced the good old days as it's over with.

    PROUD MEMBER OF TEAM GEEZER
    authorized by: Billbob and "G"
    Likes gijimbo LIKED above post

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP