nice pics salty, I think I've fished that pile before
Still havin trouble with my Lowerance 125X reading and blinkin '^0 fow" can't get it to reset to show real readings. It just keeps blinking "60". I have looked on the menu for a factory default setting but can't find one. I have turned down the strength on my imaging to jpractically nothing, as was suggested earlier, but that tdoesn't help. Shoud I be feeling or hearing some sort of pulsing or pinging sound when this thing is powered up. I 'feel' or 'hear' nothing when I put it to my ear.
Really confused and need some advice!! Yeah, I know, buy a HB. LOL
nice pics salty, I think I've fished that pile before
My success in life is measured by the number of
hunting and fishing stories that my kids can share with others
ok guys here a new one. Tell me what you think. At my first look I thought this was just a bunch of Shad schooled up. After staring at it for a while could this have been a school of shad (Smaller school on the left) and a school of whites and crappie (on the right) feeding? I did not fish it thinking it was all shad ... I'm kicking myself now for not doing so. It was taken from Granger so Whites/crappie or shad seem to be the logical thing schooling from there. We were looking for a set of condos that my budy had dropped in the area.
So does this look right?
***There has to be a fish somewhere needing to be caught!***
So for you guys that have the Down Imaging and cannot figure out why you are not getting good DI pics. I figured it out .. well more like proved my theory. Di works best in deeper water. Little ole Granger (lake I normaly fish) just does not have the depth to get the great DI pics like the ones below. What do you guys think?
I really though we were gonna pull some crappie off this tree!
Here a couple of deep water Di pics.
***There has to be a fish somewhere needing to be caught!***
[QUOTE=saltyDawg88;1187433]So for you guys that have the Down Imaging and cannot figure out why you are not getting good DI pics. I figured it out .. well more like proved my theory. Di works best in deeper water. Little ole Granger (lake I normaly fish) just does not have the depth to get the great DI pics like the ones below. What do you guys think?
The deep water is what the lakes in Florida lacks.
Lakes that I normally fish are only about 8 to 10 foot deep. Hard to get a side scan of any thing meaningful.
Floating lilly pads and roots are hard to get an image thru.
Try this test next time you are out on shallow DI images. Increase the depth range when you are shallow..... Those are some great images you have there of deeper structure.
Here is one of my deep ones See the trees and ridge in 3D in the background. Notice the depth
just a heads up. i spoke to lowrance/eagle today regarding my eagle. it will be replaced with a lowrance as eagle is being phased out. i dont think they are making any more as of now. navco owns them. thought this might be a good place to put this information
CG1 "Dances with fish"
Just a few that i have to share.