Likes Likes:  7
Thanks Thanks:  0
HaHa HaHa:  0

View Poll Results: Down imaging vs side imaging vs standard sonar??

Voters
127. You may not vote on this poll

  • I have down imaging and am satisfied with it.

    24 18.90%

  • I have down imaging and wish I had side imaging.

    18 14.17%

  • I have side imaging

    58 45.67%

  • I have standard sonar and am satisfied with it.

    19 14.96%

  • Sonar...I don't need no stinkin sonar. I am the fish whisperer.

    8 6.30%
Page 12 of 12 FirstFirst ... 29101112
Results 111 to 111 of 111

Thread: Down Imaging vs Side imaging vs neither

  1. 12-26-2014, 12:08 AM #111
    Vik3
    Vik3 is offline Slabmaster II
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    162
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default


    Quote Originally Posted by Gobob View Post
    I don't understand half what all these experts are talking about .
    Sonar is a monitor first of all, and we see what we see, I just trust my eyes.
    What do you see on that screenshot below?:



    Looks like there are sunken rocky mountings somewhere in the middle of lake on that blended dedicated DI screenshot above, but actually this is just an inclined bank bottom with some depth drop 50ft away of a bank, see below:



    Which one would you trust more for seeing fish and bottom details? To me if I had that software option for a split DI, I wouldn’t use dedicated DI at all.
    Screenshots were taken from here: https://www.facebook.com/DVProAngler/photos_stream
    Last edited by Vik3; 12-26-2014 at 01:03 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 12 of 12 FirstFirst ... 29101112
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules

BACK TO TOP