Likes Likes:  0
Thanks Thanks:  0
HaHa HaHa:  0
Page 3 of 11 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 108

Thread: HB HD DI (dedicated crystals) vs Lowrance SS DI

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    kentucky
    Posts
    2,551
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default


    Let me clear up what i posted above.i agree about tradional sonar sometimes you can be fooled about the bait fish but if your using the side scan like i always do then you already no were the structure is way before you ever get to it.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    kentucky
    Posts
    2,551
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimp View Post
    I think it would be great if people posting pics would ALSO post "how" they use DI and their "preferred method" of fishing, whether spider, LL, pulling or pushing, etc. It could help put the whole picture together for people wondering whether DI is really necessary. I'm in the "wondering" phase myself. I know I need to upgrad FF's, but how far on the upgrade is the big ?.
    ok, heres what i do. i use side scan to locate were i want to fish, find structure,hard spots,humps, points, fish. i mark the spots with gps change to screen that shows navigation/sonar. i dont use the go to or anything i just steer towards the waypiont zooming in as i get closer until i see the spot that i have marked show on the sonar screen then drop marker maybe doing this in more than one spot so things will have time to settle down before returning to cast jigs.before leaving ill mark the location with my garman handheld so the next time i return ill use the trolling motor for a quieter return. also before leaving ill take a snapshot off the location using di.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    kentucky
    Posts
    2,551
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    these are just some random pictures that i thought i would share of fish that i captured in some 597hd/di snapshots
    Attached Images Attached Images        

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    MOKAN
    Posts
    4,094
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Sounds like a waste of money to buy a DI unit, and an SI unit, especially if you find DI useless. I can't imagine not using the DI, especially for tournament fisherman. Going over a spot with 2d would give you little to no information, going over anything with DI will show you without a doubt what you are seeing. There could be cedars that are sunk, man made structure, etc. but you'd never know it with 2D sonar.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Northern Illinois
    Posts
    3,889
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    [QUOTE=Cane Pole;1686448]Here is a fact. Bait fish can look like a brush pile on 2d and is often marked as a brush pile. DI will show ground separation between fish and bottom in most cases. I run DI/2d split screen to identify this so not to mark bait fish as structure. I also run DI overlay to enhance the 2d image.

    I have 2 HDS units up front. Both are run in split screen. One is DI/2d and the other is SI/GPS.

    Where are transducers for these units both upfront, don't you get interference with the two transducers shooting out similar/same signals? I don't know just asking-thanks Jax Oh yes I like the way you have your two units screens set, I have been thinking of putting in a second unit to show GPS (cheapo than HDS) but now you got me dreaming..........................
    I don't suffer from insanity; I enjoy every minute of it.....

    PROUD MEMBER OF TEAM GEEZER

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    kentucky
    Posts
    2,551
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mduncan62 View Post
    Sounds like a waste of money to buy a DI unit, and an SI unit, especially if you find DI useless. I can't imagine not using the DI, especially for tournament fisherman. Going over a spot with 2d would give you little to no information, going over anything with DI will show you without a doubt what you are seeing. There could be cedars that are sunk, man made structure, etc. but you'd never know it with 2D sonar.
    yes i see what your saying. ill show you a picture and you can tell me how the two views differ and how you would fish differently after seeing the two. now bear in mind im not a tournament fisherman and i dont believe that the majority of people that view this thread are either .just common people wanting to catch more fish. now i have the units because i do like fishing but i like experimenting with this new technology to and i get to exchange ideals with good people like you and others.and that brings up another thing can i no your name mines robert. also keep in mind that im using the humminbird 597hd/di. this is a low cost unit and a pritty small viewing screen to that im experimenting with compared to others that these pictures are being compared to.i also want to say that the only experence that i have with lowrance di is only what i see you and others that post here.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    KY
    Posts
    1,719
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    From today.

    I caught a few from #1. The last two are down scans of #5.
    Attached Images Attached Images        

  8. #28
    Cane Pole's Avatar
    Cane Pole is offline Crappie.com 2011 Man of the Year * Crappie.com Supporter
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Pumphouse Tn.
    Posts
    24,004
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    [QUOTE=jaxsprat;1686745]
    Quote Originally Posted by Cane Pole View Post
    Here is a fact. Bait fish can look like a brush pile on 2d and is often marked as a brush pile. DI will show ground separation between fish and bottom in most cases. I run DI/2d split screen to identify this so not to mark bait fish as structure. I also run DI overlay to enhance the 2d image.

    I have 2 HDS units up front. Both are run in split screen. One is DI/2d and the other is SI/GPS.

    Where are transducers for these units both upfront, don't you get interference with the two transducers shooting out similar/same signals? I don't know just asking-thanks Jax Oh yes I like the way you have your two units screens set, I have been thinking of putting in a second unit to show GPS (cheapo than HDS) but now you got me dreaming..........................

    I have HDS SI transducer on TM and I use the US2 for 2d. The units share both transducers via Ethernet. Both units share GPS LCG4000 thru the NMEA2000 network.
    Member BS Pro-Staff and Billbob Pro-Staff
    Proud Member of Team Geezer... authorized by: billbob and "G"

  9. #29
    Cane Pole's Avatar
    Cane Pole is offline Crappie.com 2011 Man of the Year * Crappie.com Supporter
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Pumphouse Tn.
    Posts
    24,004
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    In this shot, you can see my double jig rig ( parallel horizontal lines) outside the cone of the 2d. It takes the guess work out of depth.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Member BS Pro-Staff and Billbob Pro-Staff
    Proud Member of Team Geezer... authorized by: billbob and "G"

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Northern Illinois
    Posts
    3,889
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Great picts Cane Pole thanks...Hands Clapping
    I don't suffer from insanity; I enjoy every minute of it.....

    PROUD MEMBER OF TEAM GEEZER

Page 3 of 11 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP