Likes Likes:  0
Thanks Thanks:  0
HaHa HaHa:  0
Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 55

Thread: canepoles test

  1. #21
    Cane Pole's Avatar
    Cane Pole is offline Crappie.com 2011 Man of the Year * Crappie.com Supporter
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Pumphouse Tn.
    Posts
    24,012
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default already have a snapshot.


    Quote Originally Posted by Release to the Grease... View Post
    When will the test be done? I suggest you sink Billbob and see what he looks like on SI
    his
    Last edited by Cane Pole; 06-06-2010 at 10:06 PM.
    Member BS Pro-Staff and Billbob Pro-Staff
    Proud Member of Team Geezer... authorized by: billbob and "G"

  2. #22
    Billbob's Avatar
    Billbob is offline Crappie.com Legend - 2013 Guber Of The Year * Crappie.com Supporter
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    md. st. in.
    Posts
    16,463
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    you outto see a pick of the wife
    PROUD MEMBER OF TEAM GEEZER

    Crappie.com Pro Staff
    Guber Pro Staff
    Cane Pole Pro Staff
    Haulin Ash Pro Staff

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Rochelle,GA
    Posts
    362
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rnvinc View Post
    Shoot ...we can't even acknowledge a visit from any Lowrance reps here at CC to help their customers ....like Greg and Joby do...

    My appreciation goes to HB.....
    Maybe because most of the time Lowrance units work and work like they're supposed to. And I know its a smart-a$$ remark but these people just can't give credit where its due... How long did Cane Pole keep the "sticky" post about the slow gps response rate. Over a year before they did anything about it. Lowrance didn't seem to have that issue. How about some of the other issues they fixed. Dang, lowrance didn't have those either. Just for the record I'm going to predict that Lowrance beats hb 3 to 1 in performance in this little test!!!!!!:D:D

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    South West, GA
    Posts
    6,657
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JABBO View Post
    Maybe because most of the time Lowrance units work and work like they're supposed to. And I know its a smart-a$$ remark but these people just can't give credit where its due... How long did Cane Pole keep the "sticky" post about the slow gps response rate. Over a year before they did anything about it. Lowrance didn't seem to have that issue. How about some of the other issues they fixed. Dang, lowrance didn't have those either. Just for the record I'm going to predict that Lowrance beats hb 3 to 1 in performance in this little test!!!!!!:D:D
    It wont be long before Jabbo gets his Side Imaging unit:D

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Rochelle,GA
    Posts
    362
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TnT View Post
    It wont be long before Jabbo gets his Side Imaging unit:D
    Eating ham sammichis for dinner everyday to help save up!!!!!!:D:D

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Southeast Kansas
    Posts
    1,099
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cane Pole View Post
    This is a performance comparison only. I don't give a rats butt about who buys what or from whom or what anyone's opinion may be about this test.

    I trust my abilities and knowledge and my friends abilities and knowledge enough to do a fair and balanced comparison and not depend on some report from a paid promoter.

    We have the units and we are just gonna share the information. We have nothing to gain except a little knowledge about the units. No one is forced to read or believe the results. Any complaints, well, just run your own tests or believe the pan handlers.

    If anyone has a specific test that you want performed, PM me. I am now in the process of writing out some basic test parameters. Gives me something to do.

    It is a shakedown cruise if you know the meaning.
    Food for thought...

    Pretty hard to make a scientific test out of this with there being so many variables. First thing that comes to mind insofar as scoring, is to use some type of rubric. A person could compare the results from the testing from each unit but there is no standard or baseline that has been set. Have seen some tests where they used balloons but the size of the balloon would of made the fish look like moby dick . Have you thought about putting in some objects.....various sizes (tennis ball, soft ball, etc? Suspended? Just a thought...I know its going to be very time consuming to say the least.
    Sacred Heart of Mary, pray for us now, and at the hour of our death. AMEN
    For those who believe, no explanation is necessary....for those who don't, no explanation is possible
    For the sake of his sorrowful Passion, have mercy on us and the whole world

  7. #27
    Cane Pole's Avatar
    Cane Pole is offline Crappie.com 2011 Man of the Year * Crappie.com Supporter
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Pumphouse Tn.
    Posts
    24,012
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by drifter106 View Post
    Food for thought...

    Pretty hard to make a scientific test out of this with there being so many variables. First thing that comes to mind insofar as scoring, is to use some type of rubric. A person could compare the results from the testing from each unit but there is no standard or baseline that has been set. Have seen some tests where they used balloons but the size of the balloon would of made the fish look like moby dick . Have you thought about putting in some objects.....various sizes (tennis ball, soft ball, etc? Suspended? Just a thought...I know its going to be very time consuming to say the least.
    Yep, I agree, too complex to be scientific. I am just trying to be objective. I will put out what data we collect and not bias the data with hype.

    I have some plastic bottles of different size I was gonna tape to some of the plastic.

    Good idea. I will try to rig some stuff on a string. I will take pictures of the objects before I sink them. We are hoping for fair weather.
    Member BS Pro-Staff and Billbob Pro-Staff
    Proud Member of Team Geezer... authorized by: billbob and "G"

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    278
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Can't wait to see the results!

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Lake Tobosofkee GA.
    Posts
    716
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    This is a link to a side by side comparison where both units are mounted to the same vessel and the screen shots were taken of the same structure at the same time.
    You can only assume that the settings were optimal for both units.
    DownScan v.s DownImaging - The Hull Truth

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    batavia twp, ohio
    Posts
    4,442
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cane Pole View Post
    Yep, I agree, too complex to be scientific. I am just trying to be objective. I will put out what data we collect and not bias the data with hype.

    I have some plastic bottles of different size I was gonna tape to some of the plastic.

    Good idea. I will try to rig some stuff on a string. I will take pictures of the objects before I sink them. We are hoping for fair weather.
    This is great. Since Joe average fisherman isn't going to understand everything that his unit is capable of, nor is he going to take the time to learn everything these unints will be capable of, going with an objective approach is probably going to be the best for the most people.

    I think if it were too scientic it would be lost to the masses.

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP