Thread: "Structure" or "Cover" ???

I understand it the same way you do CW. Technically though, a "structure" is something that is built like a home or whatever, so anything man-made and lowered into a lake for "cover" is also...technically...."structure".:D

Originally Posted by SpeckWick

I understand it the same way you do CW. Technically though, a "structure" is something that is built like a home or whatever, so anything man-made and lowered into a lake for "cover" is also...technically...."structure".:D

To be "technically" correct : cover is "a structure" ... while the bottom contour of a lake is "the structure" :p (actually, cover is the natural or man-made things that are ON the structure, while structure refers to the natural bottom contour ... think of it this way -- a body of water can have NO COVER, but it can't have NO STRUCTURE :D )

And, yes ... the correct terminology of cover vs structure is how you describe it, CW. But, like alot of words we use, they're often incorrectly used to mean the same thing, or both words have the same or similar meanings and we use them interchangably.

... cp

Call it "cover or structure".... build it and they will come ! ! ! !

tomato tamoto, potatoe patoto, cover structure all goes well with Croppie Crappie. Ferdi and Fred

window ,winder there and yonder its all the same:D

To kep it simple, I think of "cover" as being on "Structure". Crappiepappy is correct.