Likes Likes:  0
Thanks Thanks:  0
HaHa HaHa:  0
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 44

Thread: Fish/Depth Finder

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Keystone State
    Posts
    637
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default


    Yeah - both the Garmins on my rig (160 &240) pick up lures. Depending on the direction I put the downriggers, I can pick up the ball depth and fine tune off the 240.
    It took me awhile to figure out what the semi-vertical lines where that the 160 in the front of the boat was picking up every now and again - turns out it was my line as I retrieved it through the cone.

    I do have one problem with the Garmin's, but I believe it's in my wiring. I can't run the 160 with the anchor lights on - it shuts down on low voltage safety. And the 240 picks up air bubbles in the water column, you have to learn to understand what the echos are. Once you truly understand how to "read" the electronics, it's easy to distinquish what's fish and what's not.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Keystone State
    Posts
    637
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by labill
    We've got the same sale @ BPS here in Bossier, LA. The MC2X-60 is a good unit, it has the newer camera with infra-red AND green lights on it. (helps to see a little further in stained or muddy water.) The only drawback is it doesn't have the "direct-tech" function, which tells you which way the camera is pointed. The next model up is the XPS-60 which has both the direct-tech and temp-tech, but the camera doesn't have the green lights, only infra-red. It has been on sale here for $349, and in my opinion is the better buy. Regular price is $450. A little advice......whichever one you choose, have them test it before you leave the store. My first one had a bad connection and would not turn on, but they got another to me in a couple days.
    Aqua-Vu still has some fine tuning to do with their units. I love mine, don't get me wrong, but - they have to address 1) the lighting feature still gives you the snowstorm effect in deep or stained water, 2) the field of view is terrible - 1 foot up or down and you've lost your view, 3) they need to get rid of that CRT screen - if you don't have a sun shade -or- viewing shroud as they call it, you're not going to see the screen in daylight. Why they haven't gone to LCD yet, I'll never know. Outside of those things, it's ok.
    I believe it's Marcon that has a camera out with a 360º field of view, remote controlled camera, and improved lighting feature - but it's salty.

    here:
    http://www.marcumtech.com/products/ovs/vs560.aspx
    Last edited by Big Zig; 11-24-2004 at 04:25 PM.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Edwardsville, Indiana
    Posts
    241
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Larry-Southern Indiana

    I run Lowrance x-75 front and rear. They show great bottom detail. Just ask Moose

    They got more features than any unit I've owned. I haven't used most of them due to the fact I'm more interested in whats down below the boat not in it. As long as they show me the cover and the fish bite I'm happy.


    Larry

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Edenton N.C.
    Posts
    8,048
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I have an eagle fishmark 320 and an Lowrance X97. Both units show 1/16th ounce jigs under the transducer. If a fish is under the transducer, it's going to show it. If a fish sneezes under the boat, it's going to show it. Thats on either unit. X97 is the best unit I've ever had. CF
    The Original Woodsgoat Hater
    2011 NWR Bash Yellow Perch Champion

  5. #25
    Cane Pole's Avatar
    Cane Pole is offline Crappie.com 2011 Man of the Year * Crappie.com Supporter
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Pumphouse Tn.
    Posts
    24,004
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default I like Garmin's stuff.

    Weezer is right on. Santa is bringing me a new Garmin 250 for Xmas. Don't get hooked on too many features. Look for pixels and transponder power (rms power). Don't get hooked on dual frequency stuff, unless you plan ocean fishing. I think I have one of all makes, well almost. I read the books, screw with the settings, then forget what to do and end up letting the unit run "AUTOMATIC", except for fast panning (scanning).

    check this site out for unit comparison. My nickels worth. (ante raise)

    Cane Pole

    http://www.fish-finder-review.com/
    Member BS Pro-Staff and Billbob Pro-Staff
    Proud Member of Team Geezer... authorized by: billbob and "G"

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Metamora, Indiana
    Posts
    28
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by treepotato
    Hi JigMan,
    How's it goin? Haven't seen you here for a while. How's the fishin been on Brookville? I see on the lake reports that it is at winter pool now. Do you have much luck on it at this level?...........treepotato

    Whats up.... I've been here. Just haven't been giving up information. B-Ville has been slow but steady during drawdown. Not alot of big catches but the ones we've been getting have been really nice fish.
    When they finally get the lake to winter pool is one of my favorite periods to fish. As long as we can aviod the ice Dec is probably one of the best months to fish. They will stack on structure close to deep water and feed like crazy. Hope to get out and cross some eyeballs this week if we can get a break in the weather. See ya out there!!

  7. #27
    chaunc's Avatar
    chaunc is offline 2014 Crappie.com Man of the Year * Crappie.com Supporter
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Sharon, Pa.
    Posts
    9,569
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I use the fishmark models. Got a 480 on the dash and a 320 on the troller. Love them both.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Central Illinois
    Posts
    1,511
    Post Thanks / Like

    Question

    Should I consider buying a fish finder with GPS unit built into it or should I buy a GPS unit seperately as I hunt alot and could use it hunting? The lake I normally fish in is small enough I wouldn't have alot of trouble refinding spots but I do occasionally fish much larger lakes. I have been looking into the Hummingbird matrix system, has anyone had experiance with them? Anyone that has a fishfinder with a built in GPS system, I sure would like your opinion on their value.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Rowan County, NC Home lake: High Rock
    Posts
    5,093
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I have the Matrix 27, I have not hooked my GPS to it yet. I like having seperate units
    as I hunt too.
    Give a man a fish, feed him for a day.
    Teach a man to fish, he'll sit in a boat and drink beer all day.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    371
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I have a garmin160 and a eagle 320 finder neither with gps. I have a etrex hand held that you can buy right now at target for 88$. I recently had the chance to fish with someone who had the lowrance with gps built in. He had three states loaded in which he could pull up any lake which had the lake contours, river channels, boats ramps, channel markers anything important for fishing that you might need. On his finder it showed where we was on the lake map within 9 feet, mine showed within 74 feet. Although it is usually within 15 feet or so. I just know that whenever I have the wants bad enough I am going to have one with gps built in.

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP