HaHa HaHa:  0
Page 32 of 50 FirstFirst ... 222930313233343542 ... LastLast
Results 311 to 320 of 496

Thread: JDM lines relating to panfish

  1. #311
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Kensett, Arkansas
    Posts
    6,309
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default


    Quote Originally Posted by s_v View Post
    Alphahawk,

    I'm curious why you recommend .3 to 0.4 PE size. Would it not be an overkill? It seems that a typical .2 PE corresponds to about 4 lbs of test. A high end .3, for example YGK Lonfort, tests at 9 lbs, with a price tag to match, of course.
    The thing is on PE ratings they can be all over the place on breaking strength. We had a small discussion on here a while back about this. Then you see the ratings on rods that will call for 3# test max for FC or nylon line, and yet have a PE rating of .4....this is the rating for my Finezza Prototype 6' 10" UL rod. I would love to talk to the Japanese about the line ratings.....evidently it may not always be about breaking strength. Yet on some rods they have a max pound rating no matter the line. I am sure he could pull some jigs loose with .4 PE line. Interesting discussion for sure.


    Regards

  2. #312
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    East Tennessee
    Posts
    3,403
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Here is an example of what Randy is talking about, I encountered and struggled with this but have settled on everything equal to and less than 4lb can be used in my arsenal of rods relatively safely with proper drag settings.
    ?Name:  IMG_6984.jpg
Views: 338
Size:  79.3 KB
    Both high quality PE at .2, but different pound test rated?
    ?Name:  Adjustments.jpg
Views: 342
Size:  83.7 KB
    A little more consistent in this brand of PE.
    ?Name:  Adjustments.jpg
Views: 309
Size:  85.9 KB
    Seemingly close but not. Compare to PE numbers not even close..... .6 Ester lighter than .4 PE?
    ?Name:  Adjustments.jpg
Views: 349
Size:  65.8 KB
    Then compare nylon to Ester... .5 is two different pound test?
    I cannot find the Orange Stuff, but I am sure it fits right in to these all over the place ratings.

    Confusing yes, so the 4lb rule stands in my stable, for UL I am for the most part satisfied and happy with my direct connection to said freshwater fishes. No salty guys in my neck of the woods, but the bullies still take a lip ring when they can, part of the fun and I don’t strive to be the hero. As always your mileage may vary.


    Sent from my iPhone using Crappie.com Fishing mobile app

  3. #313
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Kuttawa, Ky
    Posts
    1,656
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I've been using SOS 2lb test and I like it. If it gets kinky, I simply change out the line and spool some fresh line on. It's priced right and it casts pretty well.
    Likes Dollfly LIKED above post

  4. #314
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    411
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I should've phrased my question better. I understand that the number for PE refers to its diameter, not lbs test. There is a very broad range of breaking strength among PE lines with the same number. In fact, PE's number corresponds to a dtex value, a Japanese standard for thickness that refers to specific gravity of the line (that translates into the amount of fiber and, therefore, thickness. For example, 0.3 PE should be 70 dtex and so on and so forth. Now, there is still quite a bit of variability in thickness among various PE lines with the same number, because the material of the fiber and the weaving process also affect the density. I just thought that a high end 0.3 PE would be an overkill...

    The more research I do, the more I am convinced that the PE rating on the rods is related to the size of the guides and the thickness of the line it allows for. Case in point: I have two rods with nearly same power, length, etc. However, one look at the first guide and you know exactly why one is rated to 0.4 PE and another to 0.8 PE...

  5. #315
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Kensett, Arkansas
    Posts
    6,309
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by s_v View Post
    I should've phrased my question better. I understand that the number for PE refers to its diameter, not lbs test. There is a very broad range of breaking strength among PE lines with the same number. In fact, PE's number corresponds to a dtex value, a Japanese standard for thickness that refers to specific gravity of the line (that translates into the amount of fiber and, therefore, thickness. For example, 0.3 PE should be 70 dtex and so on and so forth. Now, there is still quite a bit of variability in thickness among various PE lines with the same number, because the material of the fiber and the weaving process also affect the density. I just thought that a high end 0.3 PE would be an overkill...

    The more research I do, the more I am convinced that the PE rating on the rods is related to the size of the guides and the thickness of the line it allows for. Case in point: I have two rods with nearly same power, length, etc. However, one look at the first guide and you know exactly why one is rated to 0.4 PE and another to 0.8 PE...
    Exactly....I have several rods with 2mm guides.

    Regards


    Sent from my iPhone using Crappie.com Fishing mobile app

  6. #316
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    238
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by s_v View Post
    I should've phrased my question better. I understand that the number for PE refers to its diameter, not lbs test. There is a very broad range of breaking strength among PE lines with the same number. In fact, PE's number corresponds to a dtex value, a Japanese standard for thickness that refers to specific gravity of the line (that translates into the amount of fiber and, therefore, thickness. For example, 0.3 PE should be 70 dtex and so on and so forth. Now, there is still quite a bit of variability in thickness among various PE lines with the same number, because the material of the fiber and the weaving process also affect the density. I just thought that a high end 0.3 PE would be an overkill...

    The more research I do, the more I am convinced that the PE rating on the rods is related to the size of the guides and the thickness of the line it allows for. Case in point: I have two rods with nearly same power, length, etc. However, one look at the first guide and you know exactly why one is rated to 0.4 PE and another to 0.8 PE...
    So where does the Leland TSS rod fall into the picture? It's bottom guide is tiny, they say it reduces line slap but the rest of the guides seem like most other guides. This rod is designed for their SOS nylon trout line I believe?

    My Corto Nuevo Prototype has tiny guides but I plan to use the smaller diameter 3lb Varivas Advanced Trout line with this rod. Will this line work with my Corto or was this rod specifically designed for PE? All my other JDM rods have both nylon and PE ratings.


    Sent from my SM-G965U using Crappie.com Fishing mobile app

  7. #317
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Kensett, Arkansas
    Posts
    6,309
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MtnFisher View Post
    So where does the Leland TSS rod fall into the picture? It's bottom guide is tiny, they say it reduces line slap but the rest of the guides seem like most other guides. This rod is designed for their SOS nylon trout line I believe?

    My Corto Nuevo Prototype has tiny guides but I plan to use the smaller diameter 3lb Varivas Advanced Trout line with this rod. Will this line work with my Corto or was this rod specifically designed for PE? All my other JDM rods have both nylon and PE ratings.


    Sent from my SM-G965U using Crappie.com Fishing mobile app
    Don’t know which model you have but seems the 8 foot ML is designed for PE line use.....the others have a max line rating.

    Regards


    Sent from my iPad using Crappie.com

  8. #318
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    238
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alphahawk View Post
    Don’t know which model you have but seems the 8 foot ML is designed for PE line use.....the others have a max line rating.

    Regards


    Sent from my iPad using Crappie.com
    This is the only JDM rod I have with the tiny guides so I guess I will report back how it works with the Varivas 3lb. Hope it casts the tiny tungsten bead jigs well. Name:  20200607_201155.jpg
Views: 319
Size:  26.0 KBName:  20200607_201119.jpg
Views: 356
Size:  20.3 KB

    Sent from my SM-G965U using Crappie.com Fishing mobile app

  9. #319
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    411
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I think "Line" rating on your Corto refers to monofilament line, nylon, fluorocarbon, or polyester. I cannot comment the TSS rod.
    Likes MtnFisher LIKED above post

  10. #320
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Kensett, Arkansas
    Posts
    6,309
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    The TSS rod was designed for mono.....same as its sister rod the TCB. But I’m sure one could use whatever line they wanted too.


    Regards


    Sent from my iPhone using Crappie.com Fishing mobile app

Page 32 of 50 FirstFirst ... 222930313233343542 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP