Originally Posted by
blueball
Just making a point,people were complaining about reelfoot too a coue years back.Different year different place thats the point I'm trying to get across
Let the biologist do what they get paid for.Theres good and bad years at every lake,but I'm still fishing even when it's tough.The sad part is these meeting twra has they want to change things by using majority rules,not creel data.If you had a building full who wanted something changed it would probably be changed.I wish the regs were changed to what I think also,but creel data is what should be the deciding factor
Sent from my SM-S907VL using Tapatalk
Totally agree with Jaime on many points he made. Doesn't make any sense to let a group of people who may or may not really have a clue what is going on make management decisions. I have been putting out beds and haven't been fishing but have had friends send me pictures of very healthy Kentucky Lake crappie the last couple months.
Not wasting a bunch of time with these discussions again this year but also makes zero sense to raise size limits and lower creel limits if you really believe fish are starving because of carp. That would just increase competition for the theoretically scarce food. If they were going to do anything it would be remove creel limits and lower size limits to reduce competition for available baitfish.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk
2018 Crappie Masters Kentucky/Tennessee State Champion