Thanks Thanks:  0
HaHa HaHa:  0
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: SI or bigger screen

  1. #11
    keeferfish's Avatar
    keeferfish is offline Crappie.com Legend * Crappie.com Supporter
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Kearney, Mo
    Posts
    6,925
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default


    5 inch si worthless from experience
    Likes jusanothajoe LIKED above post

  2. #12
    Cane Pole's Avatar
    Cane Pole is offline Crappie.com 2011 Man of the Year * Crappie.com Supporter
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Pumphouse Tn.
    Posts
    24,004
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    7 inch is one step above worthless on SI. Ditto the experience.
    Member BS Pro-Staff and Billbob Pro-Staff
    Proud Member of Team Geezer... authorized by: billbob and "G"
    Likes jusanothajoe, blueball LIKED above post

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Coumbiana Al
    Posts
    1,958
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by quadlee View Post
    the side imaging on a 5 inch screen is not going be worth a nickel. honestly If it was me I would keep saving until I could afford a bigger screen with side imaging
    I have a Helix 5 SI, he is right. Save until you can get a bigger screen. Wish I had !!
    Minnermatics Prostaff
    My wife lets me buy all the rods and reels I can hide.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    1,424
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I have 7" lowrance gen 2 touch with si, di, and 2d. side imaging is so small it wastes my time.
    Retired golf addict

  5. #15
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Central IL
    Posts
    1,783
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I have a 1199 up front and 999 at the console. Save more money go big you will not regret it

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    East Peoria IL.
    Posts
    4,898
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Sounds like a few guys are trying to compensate for other deficiencies...

    I struggle with a similar question. My thoughts. DI depends on the depth of water you are fishing. If you are fishing in water deeper than 10' it starts to make sense. Remember the cone size in relationship to the depth of water. In shallow water that cone (field of view) won't be worth much and screen size won't matter. There won't be much to see. In shallow water, side imaging has the advantage.

    The trouble with side imaging on the bow is the transducer cable. Wait one, you can buy a trolling motor with a transducer built in. Great, however this transducer is only designed for down imaging. Great if that is what you have up front. However if you want side imaging up front then you need to mount a transducer on the trolling motor. IF you have a cable run motor, you will be fine. If you have a drive-by-wire you can spin that head unit around all day long and will snap your transducer wire.

    So, what to get, down imaging or side imaging on the bow? Both have their advantages and disadvantages. You mentioned river fishing. I gather that means relatively shallow water, under 10'. Do you have a cable drive trolling motor or one with a built in transducer? Cable driven go SI. Built in go DI. Drive-by-wire, go DI (built in).

    Not done yet.
    Another factor to consider is connectivity of the head units, bow and helm. Will the unit you are looking at be able to connect with other sonar units in your boat? Will it have the ability to map the water your fishing (AutoChart Pro or similar)? Or does you helm mounted sonar unit have the ability to map the water?
    These options open up other possibilities, and yes more money. Which sounds like you have a budget you want to stick to. Good for you, stay within your budget.

    I have a head unit that will map the water at the helm. I am trying to decide on the bow unit. I want the new Helix 9, undecided if I want SI or DI only. I have a cable driven trolling motor and SI would work great. However, eventually I want a drive-by-wire trolling motor with IPilot Link so I can set a contour course and let the motor do the work while I concentrate on fishing. That means DI. Until I decide, I am using an old Humminbird Piranha Max 220 unit on the bow. My trolling motor does not have the built in transducer so I had to mount one to the trolling motor.

    Two questions you need to answer.
    Cable or drive-by-wire trolling motor for the type of fishing I do?
    How deep is the water?

    As for head unit size, sounds like a few guys need to get glasses or a new prescription. I see everything just fine on the bow 4" screen. I do have the 899 mounted at the helm and that works equally as well. I spin it around and watch the SI from the bow of the boat. Remember I have a 16' tiller and am reading a screen that is 8-10' away from my bow seat.

    HOI Crappie Club
    Where family and friends come to compete for a little more than bragging rights.

    Quick, someone teach me how to fish so I can win this tournament!!!
    Likes DownCountryAngler LIKED above post

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    90
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hanr3 View Post
    Sounds like a few guys are trying to compensate for other deficiencies...

    I struggle with a similar question. My thoughts. DI depends on the depth of water you are fishing. If you are fishing in water deeper than 10' it starts to make sense. Remember the cone size in relationship to the depth of water. In shallow water that cone (field of view) won't be worth much and screen size won't matter. There won't be much to see. In shallow water, side imaging has the advantage.

    The trouble with side imaging on the bow is the transducer cable. Wait one, you can buy a trolling motor with a transducer built in. Great, however this transducer is only designed for down imaging. Great if that is what you have up front. However if you want side imaging up front then you need to mount a transducer on the trolling motor. IF you have a cable run motor, you will be fine. If you have a drive-by-wire you can spin that head unit around all day long and will snap your transducer wire.

    So, what to get, down imaging or side imaging on the bow? Both have their advantages and disadvantages. You mentioned river fishing. I gather that means relatively shallow water, under 10'. Do you have a cable drive trolling motor or one with a built in transducer? Cable driven go SI. Built in go DI. Drive-by-wire, go DI (built in).

    Not done yet.
    Another factor to consider is connectivity of the head units, bow and helm. Will the unit you are looking at be able to connect with other sonar units in your boat? Will it have the ability to map the water your fishing (AutoChart Pro or similar)? Or does you helm mounted sonar unit have the ability to map the water?
    These options open up other possibilities, and yes more money. Which sounds like you have a budget you want to stick to. Good for you, stay within your budget.

    I have a head unit that will map the water at the helm. I am trying to decide on the bow unit. I want the new Helix 9, undecided if I want SI or DI only. I have a cable driven trolling motor and SI would work great. However, eventually I want a drive-by-wire trolling motor with IPilot Link so I can set a contour course and let the motor do the work while I concentrate on fishing. That means DI. Until I decide, I am using an old Humminbird Piranha Max 220 unit on the bow. My trolling motor does not have the built in transducer so I had to mount one to the trolling motor.

    Two questions you need to answer.
    Cable or drive-by-wire trolling motor for the type of fishing I do?
    How deep is the water?

    As for head unit size, sounds like a few guys need to get glasses or a new prescription. I see everything just fine on the bow 4" screen. I do have the 899 mounted at the helm and that works equally as well. I spin it around and watch the SI from the bow of the boat. Remember I have a 16' tiller and am reading a screen that is 8-10' away from my bow seat.

    I have very little experience with other units, but having played with my Helix 5 SI a bit. I can say, it doesn't favor "weathered" eyes at all. Haha. I can see it just fine on my console sitting on the bow with a simple DI up front. It definitely serves its purpose great for me.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    35
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    thanks for all the replies and info. This will be the first finder put on the boat. I just bought the boat so i need "something" to at least get me through this year. BTW it is a 17 ft Bass Tracker with 70 hp motor, trolling motor is cable driven. Think i am going to go with a 7 in DI for now and save up for something bigger for next year.
    Likes Hanr3 LIKED above post

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    436
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    hi.
    I've got the helix 7si ....its ok - but man oh man I would love a 9 or 10 inch screen
    Formally: BoxingRef_Rick.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    TEXAS
    Posts
    21,128
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    FYI ....2 a my buds both use 4 and 5 inch screens with SI and DI ......a buck pair a reading glasses at the local dollar store will fix a small screen ...
    sum kawl me tha outlaw ketchn whales

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP