Thanks: 
HaHa: 
Reply With QuoteRemember you have to very different cone angles and at that low a speed I wouldn't expect the DI to pick up as much as your seeing on 2d
Crappie.com 1K Star General
Erroneous reading?
Yes, I have great brush piles but I must have my down image out of sorts as I do not think there were that many fish there.
Sent from my iPad using Crappie.com
Crappie.com 2019 Man of Year, Supermod & Moderator of the Mechanics Forum
* Crappie.com Supporter
Remember you have to very different cone angles and at that low a speed I wouldn't expect the DI to pick up as much as your seeing on 2d
Crappie.com 2016 Man of the Year
* Member Sponsor
Erroneous reading?
Like Cray mentions - cone angles of 2d vs DI are very different ...
DI is very thin front to back ...
2d covers as much in front ... as in back ... as to right ... as to left ...
Rickie
Last edited by rnvinc; 05-26-2018 at 09:34 AM.
www.podunkideas.com <--Click here
------------—————
https://www.crappie-gills-n-more.com/
https://cornfieldfishinggear.com/
------------------------>> Pro Staff Sonar AdvisorIceNitro LIKED above post
Crappie.com Legend
Crappie.com 1K Star General
I don't do fish id but as aforementioned the 2D is seeing a lot of brush. With that much brush its normal to run into target separation issues with 2D. 2D and DI look fine. You can lower 2D sensitivity and/or run in clear mode to change the way 2D looks...
