Thanks Thanks:  0
HaHa HaHa:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Sonar Quiz #45

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,426
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default


    orangeagent,if the item is strong enough and nothing blocking view unless you went too fast it will pick it up even straight under boat,unless too small .under the boat is closer and do not need as strong of a signal as outward longer signal would need,imo
    God Demonstrated his love for us. Romans 5:8

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    New Kent, VA
    Posts
    162
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I asked because that image of the beam shapes made it look like 800khz stops well short of the vertical center line. Wasn't sure if I should do 2d and SI combo instead of the triple view when using that frequency. I like the DI view as well as 2d, even though it isn't as clear as my dedicated DI I still find myself much better able to figure out fish sizes and structure shapes.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,426
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    except for true di,the di you would be seeing is from your si,and if si did not see it di could not see it
    God Demonstrated his love for us. Romans 5:8

  4. #14
    rnvinc's Avatar
    rnvinc is offline Crappie.com 2016 Man of the Year * Member Sponsor
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    West Ky
    Posts
    13,098
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Sonar Quiz #45

    Quote Originally Posted by OrangeAgent View Post
    I asked because that image of the beam shapes made it look like 800khz stops well short of the vertical center line. Wasn't sure if I should do 2d and SI combo instead of the triple view when using that frequency. I like the DI view as well as 2d, even though it isn't as clear as my dedicated DI I still find myself much better able to figure out fish sizes and structure shapes.
    The 800kHz has definitive side lobes that continue past vertical under the boat (as seen in the diagram) ...

    Name:  3562791B-34DC-449D-92CD-1117BD9690E5.jpg
Views: 206
Size:  30.5 KB

    There are several factors of Sonar frequency that come into play when deciding which frequency to use ...

    *800kHz will be more detailed with less range (as depicted below - the outer edges of the 800kHz are getting darker quicker) ...

    *455kHz will be less detail with more range (as depicted below - the outer edges of the 455kHz are brighter but the entire SI is less detailed) ...

    Name:  59A6687D-40DC-4C51-B3D9-7FC8DB7762C4.jpg
Views: 190
Size:  63.1 KB

    Rickie
    Last edited by rnvinc; 09-21-2017 at 05:01 PM.
    www.podunkideas.com <--Click here
    ------------—————
    https://www.crappie-gills-n-more.com/
    https://cornfieldfishinggear.com/

    ------------------------>> Pro Staff Sonar Advisor

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    New Kent, VA
    Posts
    162
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    That is great info, I have seen that screen shot floating around the net but never with a good explanation to go with it. I was thinking that the 800kHz was just a narrower beam so you lost some of the upper part of the water column at the edge of the range but had more detail of the bottom.

    So if I am going under a bridge with a span between the pilings of say 80 ft, if I use 800khz and a 50ft range I will still see the tops of the pilings but with super detail? I will have to take a sd card with me next time I go out I have been scanning these monster schools of shad and fish under some bridges I fish often.

  6. #16
    rnvinc's Avatar
    rnvinc is offline Crappie.com 2016 Man of the Year * Member Sponsor
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    West Ky
    Posts
    13,098
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OrangeAgent View Post
    That is great info, I have seen that screen shot floating around the net but never with a good explanation to go with it. I was thinking that the 800kHz was just a narrower beam so you lost some of the upper part of the water column at the edge of the range but had more detail of the bottom.

    So if I am going under a bridge with a span between the pilings of say 80 ft, if I use 800khz and a 50ft range I will still see the tops of the pilings but with super detail? I will have to take a sd card with me next time I go out I have been scanning these monster schools of shad and fish under some bridges I fish often.
    I find bridge pilings to be very challenging ...depending on the size of the pilings ...

    The shadow will be more noticeable than the piling itself because of the way SI paints vertical structure in the SI image ...

    Please post pix of both frequencies of your bridge pilings when you capture them ...

    Rickie
    www.podunkideas.com <--Click here
    ------------—————
    https://www.crappie-gills-n-more.com/
    https://cornfieldfishinggear.com/

    ------------------------>> Pro Staff Sonar Advisor

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP