Originally Posted by
OrangeAgent
That is great info, I have seen that screen shot floating around the net but never with a good explanation to go with it. I was thinking that the 800kHz was just a narrower beam so you lost some of the upper part of the water column at the edge of the range but had more detail of the bottom.
So if I am going under a bridge with a span between the pilings of say 80 ft, if I use 800khz and a 50ft range I will still see the tops of the pilings but with super detail? I will have to take a sd card with me next time I go out I have been scanning these monster schools of shad and fish under some bridges I fish often.