Printable View
I've been looking at the pros/cons of these two products.... Is it better to have the 360's range and ability to find cover over a large area or the Garmin Livescope's small but cooler field of view. I'm leaning towards the 360. What do you guys think? I do already have a Lowr SI ad DI units on my boat.....
I picked the 360. It's looking all around where the live scope only looks where the TM is pointed. Now the lives cope gives u depths and clarity to see baits.
I have had both, have livescope now. It’s not hard to look out and scan tm side to side to see the brush. I’d rather see fish moving in and around the brush and see my jig on their nose than see the blurry image of some brush 360 gives....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don’t have experience with the 360, but I like the Livescope.
This guy does a pretty good comparison of the two, has both mounted on the bow. From what he is saying is the 360 is better at locating submerged structure and the livescope is best for seeing the structure and the fish on it.
YouTube
Thanks guys, sounds like the Livescope just might be the way to go... Since I might have just a few Waypoints saved on the lakes I fish.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by KM13
there was a article on electronics in one of the issues of crappie now digital magazine not too long ago, where the guy had both livescope and 360 and his rational for both