Lawmaker: 'Cajun Navy' proposal intended to remove, not add, restrictions
Lawmaker: 'Cajun Navy' proposal intended to remove, not add, restrictions | Louisiana Flood 2016 | theadvocate.com
I agree Don, I also like the Cajun Boy can survive, but it's not quite up to our standards here, but anyone can google up
"Cajun Boys Can Survive" and watch it.
"G" Gone but not forgotten!!
Lawmaker: 'Cajun Navy' proposal intended to remove, not add, restrictions
Lawmaker: 'Cajun Navy' proposal intended to remove, not add, restrictions | Louisiana Flood 2016 | theadvocate.com
Ephesians 1:13
Smirk
Great job of balancing a lot of emotions in that recording. . The devil in me smirked more than a few times.
My hats off to all the super aqua men and 3%ers that are helping out. There's a special place for warriors like y'all.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The idea behind making new laws is noble but don't they realize that this was a 100 year storm. So the next time there is such a storm, a hundred years from now, none of us will be around to help. So all of the time spent training, getting certified, and paying the fees will be for naught. They're talking about doing this to protect the navy from lawsuits and such if someone gets hurts or God forbid, a boat capsizes and people drown. You know some ambulance chasing lawyer will be there to take you to court and put the blame on you. My thinking is if they want to pass a law to help things out is to pass a no fault law. There are many such laws already on the books that pertain to other situations so why not have one for emergency responders helping save people who are stranded or who's lives are being threaten by flood waters.
Just my thoughts,
"gene"
"G" Gone but not forgotten!!Scoot LIKED above post
PPG it would be too easy to slip it in to the good samaritan laws.
Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk
PawPaw Gene LIKED above post