HaHa HaHa:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Adam Martin, can you comment on Modified Method results?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    77
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Ky. Afield


    I was very disappointed in the coverage of Ky. Afield on the modified unified method. I become concerned when there is so much secrecy about what actually took place and how many pounds were removed. If the figure of $500,00 was accurate and the removal rate was as low as has been mentioned how many of these dog and pony show.will we go through before all the money is spent with no improvement in the carp issue. There was no shortage of dignitaries but no sportsmen were allowed to attend. I just hope this does not turn into another government waste of tax money with no results.


    Quote Originally Posted by Greenwing View Post
    I wonder if the heavy current, lake conditions and weather hurt the numbers? I was talking to a commercial fisherman last fall, he was talking about how when there is current the carp usually leave the bays.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Benton, KY
    Posts
    660
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Greenwing View Post
    I wonder if the heavy current, lake conditions and weather hurt the numbers? I was talking to a commercial fisherman last fall, he was talking about how when there is current the carp usually leave the bays.

    I kind of questioned that too. I know the time I run into Asian Carp the most is in the late summer or early fall when I start idling shallow waters for early wood duck and teal season, not uncommon to run into some really big schools in the backs of bays then. About the only thing I can think of for the trial to be in February would be due to more of the sport fish being out in deeper water, and/or lower numbers of recreational boaters on the water.
    Likes smashdn LIKED above post

  3. #13
    M R Dux's Avatar
    M R Dux is offline Crappie.com Legend , 2018 Crappie.com Man of the Year * Crappie.com Supporter * Member Sponsor
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Benton,KY / KY Lake
    Posts
    7,468
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I too was disappointed in the KY Afield segment. A little birdie gave me some insight. When the feds (USF&W & USGS) are involved, information is only going to be allowed out when/what the feds say so. One issue the Modified Method folks didn't take into account was one we openly discussed here before they started. The issue was the numbers of man-made structures that they had to clear out before they could be successful.The areas they chose were some that were heavily saturated with stake beds and brush piles. More thought and scouting will probably take place before they try the Modified Method in other parts of our lakes. It was shown it would work in ideal situations.
    www.crappie-gills-n-more.com
    Podunk Ideas Pro Staff /test platform
    PICO Lures Field Rep
    Excel Boats Pro Staff

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Ky
    Posts
    4,643
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Guess I’ll be cleaning out a lot of waypoints in those two bays.
    Likes GREENFISH LIKED above post

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    77
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Shut up and fish

    You all have heard the story about the fisherman and game warden in a boat together when the fisherman pulled out a stick
    of dynamite. The game warden was busy telling the fisherman how it was illegal to use dynamite to harvest fish. The fisherman kindly handed the game warden the stick of dynamite and asked are you going to keep on talking or are you going to fish. Maybe the state and federal people need to review this story and apply it to the carp. This may be the cheapest and most efficient method to remove large numbers of the carp !!! Are they going to keep on talking or fish?

    QUOTE=crp4570;3973339]Guess I’ll be cleaning out a lot of waypoints in those two bays. [/QUOTE]
    Likes crappie flash LIKED above post

  6. #16
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    KENTUCKY
    Posts
    136
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Kentucky Department of Fish & Wildlife
    Asian Carp Information


    New update posted on the KDFWR website concerning the Modified-Unified Method. (Located under the western Kentucky projects)
    This wasn’t my project, but I was there for three weeks helping so I can answer a few questions and share my two cents. The information flow has been super slow, but the government is not known for speed. I think a longer write up is being prepared, but I’m not sure of the timeline.

    P.S. redear and crappie are on beds right now. Not sure what this polar vortex is going to do to them, but it’s been an interesting spring to say the least.
    Likes perchjerker108, M R Dux, kycreek LIKED above post
    Thanks Clint, BuckeyeCrappie thanked you for this post

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Franklin, KY
    Posts
    757
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Amartinbio View Post
    P.S. redear and crappie are on beds right now. Not sure what this polar vortex is going to do to them, but it’s been an interesting spring to say the least.
    Best news I've read in a while. Adam, thank you for being on here.

    Do you think there is a need to better educate the general sportsman and angler in to the role of the commercial fisherman in this? I continually read sportfisherman voicing that commercial fishing should be banned on public waters, admittedly in connection with catfish, and that the commercial fishing is negatively impacting the "sport catfishing." Having read the studies from KDFWR hoop nets and blurbs on the KDFWR webpage about the findings from the ride-alongs with commercial fisherman I think that is a valuable narrative to get out there as to how the commercial fisherman are and will be an integral part of this "war on carp" equation.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    KENTUCKY
    Posts
    136
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smashdn View Post
    Best news I've read in a while. Adam, thank you for being on here.

    Do you think there is a need to better educate the general sportsman and angler in to the role of the commercial fisherman in this? I continually read sportfisherman voicing that commercial fishing should be banned on public waters, admittedly in connection with catfish, and that the commercial fishing is negatively impacting the "sport catfishing." Having read the studies from KDFWR hoop nets and blurbs on the KDFWR webpage about the findings from the ride-alongs with commercial fisherman I think that is a valuable narrative to get out there as to how the commercial fisherman are and will be an integral part of this "war on carp" equation.
    In my opinion, in that particular case there needs to be more dialogue and interaction between biologists, commercial fishermen, and catfishermen. It’s been a huge topic of debate and there was a special committee appointed to sort out the issue, but there is still a lack of trust there and still a few topics to be decided. It’s a good example of one of the most difficult aspects of fisheries management. How should a fishery be managed when two or more user groups want different things from the same fishery? I’ve yet to discover a “perfect” management option in any fishery, but communication and openness builds trust and tends to reduce conflict.
    I do agree that more education on the topic (how we collect data, what commercial fishermen catch, what harvest does to a fishery, etc) would be helpful for everyone involved. But without building trust, no one will believe what you’re saying in your education efforts (and rightly so).

    Im always amazed at how understanding the sport anglers have been on ky and Barkley regarding commercial Asian carp fishermen. There have certainly been some issues and tangled props and cut nets, but I think everyone has realized how necessary these control efforts are.
    Likes GREENFISH, M R Dux LIKED above post

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    LEITCHFIELD
    Posts
    237
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    What you have to look at is not the $/lb of fish caught but the long term effect of 500K lbs being taken from the lake. That will be harder to determine but in the end game. If the fishery improvement is significant enough to generate better fishing (tourism) then its a win..

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP