HaHa HaHa:  0
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: Garmin Livescope LVS 32 vs LVS 34

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,685
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default


    Quote Originally Posted by lowe rider View Post
    Just an FYI.

    The 93 series units only have one Ethernet port on them. If you want to network two of them and a Livescope box you will have to have a hub to link all three.

    Is this true for the UHD models.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Paris Landing, Tn.
    Posts
    1,689
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grainraiser View Post
    Is this true for the UHD models.
    Yes.
    if you want an Echomap unit with 2 network ports you have to step up to the ultra units.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Ky
    Posts
    732
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I made the switch to the 34 after using the 32 since November 2019. For me the 34 was a good upgrade, eliminated the problem with weak zones, clearer screen, better target separation and better definition. I don't feel like that the 34 will help me catch anymore fish than the 32. You can't go wrong with either one.
    Thanks CrappiePappy, 91tiger thanked you for this post

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2022
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    1
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I was in the same boat as you. I already had the 93sv, but was waiting to buy either the lvs 32 or lvs 34. I saw some lvs32s with the black box go down to $989 on some websites. I've watched a lot of videos on livescope and while the lvs 34 is better, what I saw with the 32 was good enough for me with it being that much cheaper. I ended up price matching at Dicks Sporting Goods while using my scorecard 3x bonus point day to get $100 in rewards. Essentially making it $889 for me.

    I have been happy using the lvs 32 with the 93sv on my kayak and have yet to regret not getting the better tranducer. I'm extremely excited to get out on the ice with it this winter. I think if money is not an issue than go with the newest. If you are under a tighter budget then you will still probably be happy with the lvs32. I bought a new rifle with the money saved so I ended up with two new toys.

    Sent from my SM-G973U using Crappie.com Fishing mobile app
    Likes SuperDave336 LIKED above post

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2022
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    66
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    32 and 93 uhd has helped me catch more fish than not. It also helped me find and see plenty of fish I couldn’t catch. Can’t go wrong with either. I’d go 32 and get a bigger screen down the road with that savings. I have two 93 UHDs connected and would love a bigger screen just for my livescope.
    Likes grizwilson LIKED above post

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Kings Mtn., Ky.
    Posts
    1,493
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I have a uhd 93 sv & agree that the bigger screen would be nice for livescope. I'll get one later on myself.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2024
    Location
    Preachersville, Ky
    Posts
    1
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I have fished with Livescope about 3 years. I started with lvs32 and a 93sv, last year I moved to the 1026sv and that helped my old eyes see better. If I was to upgrade again it would either be a 12" screen OR the lvs34. I've watched videos of the 32 vs 34 and even with the better image of the 34 for my personal style of fishing I have a hard time justifying the expense of the 34. The larger screen seems to make more sense to me. Down the road I'll probably end up with the 32 and a 12" screen. I hope.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2022
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    66
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I just went with a 126sv for livescope kept two 93svs for mapping and down/side image at the stick, wish I would have went gps map instead of another echomap the bigger screens nice but to me it just bigger pixels it seems. Next time…

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Paris Landing, Tn.
    Posts
    1,689
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Just in case you’re not aware the Echomap units can’t be networked with the GPS Map units if that is important to you.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2022
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    66
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Correct thank you for throwing that out there that was my deciding factor to stick with the echomap but now after seeing it compared to some other videos of gps map units. I was hoping the extra pixels coming from a 93 to the 126 would have been a little better picture. That being said a 10” has the same pixel count as a 12” so in theory the 10 may be a better looking screen if anyone is wondering

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP