I agree. A tract of land can only support so many deer. The numbers can vary depending on different variables. amount of cover, food, water,etc.. There will be a limit to the population either from man or mother nature. Either form man through a hefty harvest or mother nature through disease. Mans method is the most beneficial. Mother natures way just feeds scavengers. Your local biologist can tell you how many deer per acre your area can hold and not run a high risk of disease. there are so many hunters out there that don't understand that they would benefit the herd by shooting the hell out of the deer they have because in many areas, they are just too overpopulated. Bigger bucks and a healthier herd come out of aggressive harvesting. To many people are just hunting for horns. They need to shoot does and hunt for meat too. thinning the does will cause competition from bucks and the best genes will be kept in the herd. selective harvest then becomes important to remove the undesired bucks from the buck population. A good management plan plus a good nutrition plan equals higher numbers of quality bucks. Five years can make a huge difference in a herd if the management plan is stuck to aggressively. Also cut the chances of disease by a huge percentage. CF
The Original Woodsgoat Hater
2011 NWR Bash Yellow Perch Champion