Are you suggesting that if there was a company having North Koreans doing useful work where that company was paying them a couple bowls of rice a day for their labor that you would be opposed to that arrangement?
I wonder what those workers currently living on tree bark and grass would think of you for denying them a chance for a couple bowls of rice a day and that they should now just go back to eating bark and grass since you are opposed to economic transactions where both parties would benefit from said transaction and where the North Koreans standard of living could have improved by two bowls of rice a day over his existing condition of no rice.
Who is of more comfort to the disadvantaged you who wouldn't be of any comfort or aid for them or this impartial unconcerned capitalistic transaction which would actually benefit them?
Yes I can see what great compassion you have for the human condition.
“There is no difference between communism and socialism, except in the means of achieving the same ultimate end: communism proposes to enslave men by force, socialism—by vote. It is merely the difference between murder and suicide.” Ayn Rand