Give the Quantum hypercast a try. I use them on all my long rods.
I was looking at some of these and was wondering how they work. Are they as easy to cast accuratly as an open face spinning reel? I'm thinking of putting it on a nine foot uglystik. Would that be a good combo?
Thanks!
Give the Quantum hypercast a try. I use them on all my long rods.
I got a bill dance ultra light combo for my daughter. It cast real easy but the quality is junk. I was fixing it after a couple trips.
I Use One For Vertical Jiggin ,but I Don,t Like To Cast Withit As Well As A Spinning Reel
PROUD MEMBER OF TEAM GEEZER
I'd pick any decent spinning reel over an underspin for casting. If you were just planning on vertical jigging, I'd probably go with an inexpensive fly reel. There's less that can go wrong with a fly reel.
Underspin? This is different than a regular spincast?
I think I got one...
Underspin is a closed face reel that mounts on the underside of the rod like an open face. Several companies now make them. Bass Pro offers once called the Tiny Lite. Frankly, I don't see the point in one. - Roberta
"Anglers are born honest,
but they get over it." - Ed Zern
Huh...haven't run into one of those yet. Thanks!
I think I got one...
an "underspin" is just a spincast reel that "hangs down" under the rod ... like a regular spinning reel. And it's designed to be used on spinning rods. Spincast reels are designed to be used on "baitcast" rods.Originally Posted by Roberta
Roberta - the "point", and the only real advantage in an underspin ... is that you use your pointing finger, rather than your thumb, when engaging the reel. This keeps the thumb wrapped around the rod, along with the remaining three fingers, when casting ... for a better grip, and control. With the "open hand" position that a spincast reel causes you to maintain, when casting, you're more likely to throw the whole outfit into the water - than you are with a underspin, which allows you to grip the rod with a closed hand & extended finger. Other than that, the weight of the reel is suspended below the reel seat ... which means you don't have to "balance" the weight of the reel, like you might have to do with a spincast (which sits on top of the rod). Minor points, to an adult, yes .... but, for the young and/or elderly (and weaker wristed), it's some positive points.
I am, of course, referring to the larger, heavier spincast/underspin reels .... the "microlite" & "ultralite" versions don't cause these problems, as much.
They (ul's & ml's) do have their own "drawbacks", though .... such as weak gears/drag systems, & small bore line spools. The small line spools cause a couple of problems .... slow retrieve ratio/line pickup speed (which makes for more handle cranking to retrieve a bait/fish) & tightly coiled line (which creates the need for line changes, often).
The biggest "downside" to a spincast or underspin reel, IMHO ... is that you have to depend on the drag system, when you hook a large fish. With a spinning reel, even a UL one, you can "backwind" the reel and play the fish down. I've done this, successfully, on fish up to 12lbs ... using UL reels & 4lb test line. Had I been using a spincast/underspin, chances are those fish would not have been landed. ........... cp
CP, while i agree that you'll have to change line often, i've caught some big channel cats at Ky lake on my Daiwa underspin. Some were over 7lbs and on 8lb test on my 10ft rod. What a blast. Took a while to land them because of the small spool but i back reeled with no problem. Dont know about the other reels but that daiwa was alright.