I'm not trying to stir the pot but I didn't read any evidence in that article at all. It was just a guy saying "these guys were right and these guys were wrong. You cant argue with scientific data" But no data was offered. They just said "indeed it was the fire and this was the first ever steel building in history that collapsed from fire" Maybe they had evidence and just didn't feel like putting it in there for all of us "lesser intelligent" readers who might not understand. The big hole on the one side was better proof in my eyes and that was offered by a crappie.com member on this forum to me. This article didn't even mention that. I can find a few articles on the web too that would argue the opposite opinion but whats the use. I have come to the conclusion that there will never be any official investigation or any real answers , rather the same dose of criticism for those who would question the official report. For the record, I am very open to being wrong in my opinion of this tragedy but I would ask this question of all you military guys. The 9/11 tragedy was the biggest air defense failure in our country's history besides maybe pearl harbor. Why then was no one repremanded or demoted in the wake of this happening? To the contrary people were promoted and rewarded in the wake of 9/11. I know that when it got out that they had transported nuclear weapons by truck across the country heads rolled and many people lost there positions all the way to the top....and no one even got hurt. If people would read the "patriot act" they would see a little more clearly what was gained by those in power in the wake of 9/11. If things happened the way they were reported then so be it, but the government got a big shot in the arm in the way of public approval and a sweetheart bill that gave them all the power of a communist dictatorship. How they will use that power in the future is what I am most worried about.
WTC7 mystery solved-1, Conspiracy theorists-0
"Trap" hasn't posted in over a month ...
Linear Mode
