could be the composite material that is on the decks.I have a 2004 and it is all composite on decks and floor.
I'm looking at a Polar kraft 1885, 2004 boat. I noticed that the 2005 is an 1886 and is listed as about 300# heaver. Any body know the difference in the two boats?
could be the composite material that is on the decks.I have a 2004 and it is all composite on decks and floor.
living life to its fullest, This is not a dressed rehearsal.
Is the composit floor & decks a good or bad thing. How do you like your 2004?
I like the composite.love the boat except the camo paint.everybody wants to know if im a duch hunter.
living life to its fullest, This is not a dressed rehearsal.
The boat rides and handles better than any alum boat i have ever owned.Im a big feller and i can stand on any corner and shoot docks.what size motor does yours have?
living life to its fullest, This is not a dressed rehearsal.
sounds like a good boat. I havent had a minutes trouble out of mine but being too slow.i only have a mercury 50 and i get passed alot
living life to its fullest, This is not a dressed rehearsal.
I'd holler at the Polar Kraft factory folks to find out exactly what the difference is. The composite is something like HPDM that is used under the decks and trolling motor mount area for reinforcement and backing. Bigger has that throughout on his 1886. Not sure if the 1885 had it or not...that might be the 300# difference. The composite is a good thing. Makes for a strong deck that will not rot.
I was thinking the 1885 did not have a flat floor, but is tilted like that one you looked at some time ago. Could be wrong though, but I doubt anyone here can tell you in detail exactly what the difference between the two is. PK doesn't have a whole lot of market share compared to a lot of mfgs.
Wannabe...
Wannabe...v2.0
A lot like the old Wannabe... except with fewer bad words. And Karate chop action. But, yes, still purtier than you.